Literature DB >> 15497058

Actual and desired duration of foreplay and intercourse: discordance and misperceptions within heterosexual couples.

S Andrea Miller1, E Sandra Byers.   

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-two heterosexual couples reported their actual and ideal duration of foreplay and intercourse, as well as their perceptions of their partners' desired duration of foreplay and intercourse. Further, participants reported the duration of foreplay and intercourse that they felt most men and most women wanted. Ideal length of foreplay did not differ for men and women. However, men reported a significantly longer ideal duration of intercourse than did their partners. The ideal duration of foreplay and intercourse were significantly longer than the actual duration for both genders. The women, but not the men, significantly underestimated their partners' desired duration of foreplay and intercourse. Further, both genders exhibited faulty stereotypes concerning men's but not women's ideal scripts. Men were seen as desiring a significantly shorter duration of foreplay and intercourse than the ideal reported by the men in the study. Both men's and women's perceptions of their partners' ideal duration of foreplay and intercourse were found to be more strongly related to their own sexual stereotypes than to their partners' self-reported sexual desires, suggesting that people rely on sexual stereotypes when estimating their partners' ideal sexual scripts. Men's and women's ideal scripts and men's and women's sexual stereotypes concerning the opposite gender's ideal duration of foreplay were found to uniquely predict the foreplay performance script. For intercourse, men's and women's ideal scripts and men's stereotypes concerning the duration of intercourse that women want uniquely predicated the performance script. We present potential reasons for the discrepancy in individuals' performance and ideal scripts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15497058     DOI: 10.1080/00224490409552237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  10 in total

1.  Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; Elisabeth A Lloyd; Kim Wallen; Helen E Fisher
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  In their own words: a qualitative content analysis of women's and men's preferences for women's genitals.

Authors:  Margo Mullinax; Debby Herbenick; Vanessa Schick; Stephanie A Sanders; Michael Reece
Journal:  Sex Educ       Date:  2015-05-21

3.  Determinants of sexual dysfunction among clinically diagnosed diabetic patients.

Authors:  William Kba Owiredu; Nafiu Amidu; Huseini Alidu; Charity Sarpong; Christian K Gyasi-Sarpong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Friction-lowering capabilities and human subject preferences for a hydrophilic surface coating on latex substrates: implications for increasing condom usage.

Authors:  Benjamin G Cooper; Stacy L Chin; Ruiqing Xiao; Karen Buch; Ducksoo Kim; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Cyberphysical Human Sexual Behavior Acquisition System (SeBA): Development and Implementation Study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoping Zhou; Jichao Zhao; Xun Liang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Procreative sex in infertile couples: the decay of pleasure? A letter to the editor.

Authors:  Ashley Gadarowski
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  A response to Gadarowski's letter to the editor.

Authors:  Isabella Piva; Angela Graziano; Giuseppe Lo Monte; Stefano Caracciolo; Roberto Marci
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Perceptions of normal and abnormal ejaculatory latency times: an observational study in Ghanaian males and females.

Authors:  Nafiu Amidu; William K B A Owiredu; Peter P M Dapare; Benedict B Antuamwine
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 9.  Sexual Desire Discrepancy: A Position Statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

Authors:  Dewitte Marieke; Carvalho Joana; Corona Giovanni; Limoncin Erika; Pascoal Patricia; Reisman Yacov; Štulhofer Aleksandar
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.491

10.  The Erogenous Mirror: Intersubjective and Multisensory Maps of Sexual Arousal in Men and Women.

Authors:  Lara Maister; Aikaterini Fotopoulou; Oliver Turnbull; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-06-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.