Literature DB >> 15496744

Measurement in clinical vs. biological medicine: the Rasch model as a bridge on a widening gap.

Luigi Tesio1.   

Abstract

In the dominant Bio-medical paradigm Medicine is mostly Biology applied to Man. Measurement in Biology stems from physical sciences and has established validity. This is not the case for whole-person variables such as behaviors and psychic conditions (disability, pain, knowledges). The very existence of these variables can only be inferred by observing samples of representative behaviors. The quantity of the inferred variable may only come from subjective and discrete counts (scores) of events (coming in a questionnaire). Contemporary statistics demonstrated that raw scores intrinsically lack fundamental properties for scientific measurement, whatever their algebraic manipulations. This adds to the stigmatization of Clinical Medicine as "soft science", compared to Bio-medicine. In the 1960s Georg Rasch inaugurated a new statistical approach allowing transformation of raw scores into objective linear measures comparable to physical measures. This may help the Bio-medical paradigm to redirect resources from laboratory bench back to bedside.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  5 in total

1.  An instrument to objectively measure pharmacist professionalism as an outcome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Gregory E Stone
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-05

Review 2.  Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mark V Johnston; Daniel E Graves
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  The impact of common mental disorders on work ability in mentally and physically demanding construction work.

Authors:  J S Boschman; H F van der Molen; M H W Frings-Dresen; J K Sluiter
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Rasch validation of the Chinese parent-child interaction scale (CPCIS).

Authors:  Patrick Ip; Winnie Tso; Nirmala Rao; Frederick Ka Wing Ho; Ko Ling Chan; King Wa Fu; Sophia Ling Li; Winnie Goh; Wilfred Hing-Sang Wong; Chun Bong Chow
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  From codes to language: is the ICF a classification system or a dictionary?

Authors:  Luigi Tesio
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.