Literature DB >> 15495898

An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.

Glyn W Humphreys1, Bettina Jung Stalmann, Chris Olivers.   

Abstract

We used a probe dot procedure to examine the time course of attention in preview search (Watson & Humphreys, 1997). Participants searched for an outline red vertical bar among other new red horizontal bars and old green vertical bars, superimposed on a blue background grid. Following the reaction time response for search, the participants had to decide whether a probe dot had briefly been presented. Previews appeared for 1,000 msec and were immediately followed by search displays. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated a standard preview benefit relative to a conjunction search baseline. In Experiment 2, search was combined with the probe task. Probes were more difficult to detect when they were presented 1,200 msec, relative to 800 msec, after the preview, but at both intervals detection of probes at the locations of old distractors was harder than detection on new distractors or at neutral locations. Experiment 3A demonstrated that there was no difference in the detection of probes at old, neutral, and new locations when probe detection was the primary task and there was also no difference when all of the shapes appeared simultaneously in conjunction search (Experiment 3B). In a final experiment (Experiment 4), we demonstrated that detection on old items was facilitated (relative to neutral locations and probes at the locations of new distractors) when the probes appeared 200 msec after previews, whereas there was worse detection on old items when the probes followed 800 msec after previews. We discuss the results in terms of visual marking and attention capture processes in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15495898     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Anna E Ipata; James W Bisley; Jacqueline Gottlieb; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: evidence from negative color carry-over effects.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Glyn W Humphreys; Jason J Braithwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

3.  Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Mandy V Bartsch; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modulation of visual attention by object affordance.

Authors:  Patricia Garrido-Vásquez; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Perceptual grouping constrains inhibition in time-based visual selection.

Authors:  Zorana Zupan; Derrick G Watson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.

Authors:  Changrun Huang; Ana Vilotijević; Jan Theeuwes; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-23

8.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09

9.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.