AIM: To review the status of family medicine in Eastern European countries, specifically the position of the discipline within the health care system, its academic status, and expected trends in the development of the discipline. METHODS: We used available data in the literature and information gathered from personal contacts with members of European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine (ESGP/FM) expert groups, European Academy of Teachers in General Practice (EURACT), and European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN). Personal interviews with key informants from countries that do not have members in these organizations were used. We also performed a Medline search using terms "primary health care" and "family medicine". RESULTS: It was difficult to get standardized information about the issues addressed. In some countries, contact persons and articles were impossible to find. Because of that, information from some countries is lacking (e.g. Belarus, Ukraine, the Kavkaz states and Central Asian republics). The information from the 14 countries showed that family medicine was formally widely recognized as a specific discipline. In 13 of them, there were some programs of vocational training. In 10 countries, academic recognition has resulted in rapid development in the past two decades, especially after 1989, but in Bulgaria and Moldova we found no evidence of family medicine departments. CONCLUSION: The position of general practice in most Central and Eastern European countries is formally adequate, but a lot of effort will still be needed to achieve the desired level of its recognition and quality.
AIM: To review the status of family medicine in Eastern European countries, specifically the position of the discipline within the health care system, its academic status, and expected trends in the development of the discipline. METHODS: We used available data in the literature and information gathered from personal contacts with members of European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine (ESGP/FM) expert groups, European Academy of Teachers in General Practice (EURACT), and European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN). Personal interviews with key informants from countries that do not have members in these organizations were used. We also performed a Medline search using terms "primary health care" and "family medicine". RESULTS: It was difficult to get standardized information about the issues addressed. In some countries, contact persons and articles were impossible to find. Because of that, information from some countries is lacking (e.g. Belarus, Ukraine, the Kavkaz states and Central Asian republics). The information from the 14 countries showed that family medicine was formally widely recognized as a specific discipline. In 13 of them, there were some programs of vocational training. In 10 countries, academic recognition has resulted in rapid development in the past two decades, especially after 1989, but in Bulgaria and Moldova we found no evidence of family medicine departments. CONCLUSION: The position of general practice in most Central and Eastern European countries is formally adequate, but a lot of effort will still be needed to achieve the desired level of its recognition and quality.
Authors: Dionne S Kringos; Wienke G W Boerma; Allen Hutchinson; Jouke van der Zee; Peter P Groenewegen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Willemijn L A Schäfer; Wienke G W Boerma; Dionne S Kringos; Jan De Maeseneer; Stefan Gress; Stephanie Heinemann; Danica Rotar-Pavlic; Chiara Seghieri; Igor Svab; Michael J Van den Berg; Milena Vainieri; Gert P Westert; Sara Willems; Peter P Groenewegen Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka; Igor Švab; Marek Oleszczyk; Bohumil Seifert; W Henry Smithson; Adam Windak Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 2.497