Literature DB >> 15495111

Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia.

S Torvaldsen1, C L Roberts, J C Bell, C H Raynes-Greenow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although epidural analgesia provides the most effective labour analgesia, it is associated with some adverse obstetric consequences, including an increased risk of instrumental delivery. Many centres discontinue epidural analgesia late in labour to improve a woman's ability to push and reduce the rate of instrumental delivery.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of discontinuing epidural analgesia late in labour on: i) rates of instrumental deliveries and other delivery outcomes; and ii) analgesia and satisfaction with labour care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (1 September 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of epidurals discontinued late in labour compared with continuation of the same epidural protocol until birth, in women who receive an epidural for analgesia in the first stage of labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality and extracted the data. We analysed categorical data using relative risk (RR), and continuous data using weighted mean difference. MAIN
RESULTS: We identified six studies, of which five were included (462 participants). Three of these were high quality studies whilst the other two were judged to be of lower quality because placebo was not used and the method of randomisation not described. All studies used different epidural analgesia protocols (type of drug, dosage or method of administration). Overall, the reduction in instrumental delivery rate was not statistically significant (23% versus 28%, RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.15) nor was there any statistically significant difference in rates of other delivery outcomes. The only statistically significant result was an increase in inadequate pain relief when the epidural was stopped (22% versus 6%, RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.99 to 6.80). REVIEWERS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that discontinuing epidural analgesia late in labour reduces the rate of instrumental delivery. There is evidence that it increases the rate of inadequate pain relief in the second stage of labour. The practice of discontinuing epidurals is widespread and the size of the reduction in instrumental delivery rate could be clinically important; therefore, we recommend a larger study than those included in this review be undertaken to determine whether this effect is real or has occurred by chance, and to provide stronger evidence about the safety aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15495111      PMCID: PMC8826759          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004457.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  20 in total

1.  Trends in labour and birth interventions among low-risk women in New South Wales.

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Charles S Algert; Ian Douglas; Sally K Tracy; Brian Peat
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Eason; M Labrecque; G Wells; P Feldman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Benefits of continuous infusion epidural analgesia throughout vaginal delivery.

Authors:  M L Johnsrud; P O Dale; B Løvland
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Second stage of labour with or without extradural analgesia.

Authors:  K C Phillips; T A Thomas
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesia.

Authors:  R G Bates; C W Helm; A Duncan; D K Edmonds
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-12

6.  Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.

Authors:  R B Johanson; E Heycock; J Carter; A H Sultan; K Walklate; P W Jones
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-06

7.  Faecal incontinence after childbirth.

Authors:  C MacArthur; D E Bick; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-01

8.  Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey.

Authors:  S Brown; J Lumley
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-02

9.  Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain--options of 1091 Finnish parturients.

Authors:  P Ranta; M Spalding; T Kangas-Saarela; R Jokela; A Hollmén; P Jouppila; R Jouppila
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  The influence of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor and method of delivery in nulliparous women.

Authors:  D H Chestnut; G E Vandewalker; C L Owen; J N Bates; W W Choi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  6 in total

1.  Intrapartum epidural analgesia and onset of lactation: a prospective study in an Italian birth centre.

Authors:  Paola Agnese Mauri; Norma Nilde Guerrini Contini; Simona Giliberti; Francesco Barretta; Dario Consonni; Mariangela Negri; Irene Di Benedetto
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-03

2.  Labour analgesia: Recent advances.

Authors:  Sunil T Pandya
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

3.  Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event.

Authors:  Fiona C Warren; Keith R Abrams; Su Golder; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Effects of epidural lidocaine analgesia on labor and delivery: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

Authors:  Shahram Nafisi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Continuing epidural analgesia during the second stage and ACOG definition of arrest of labor on maternal-fetal outcomes.

Authors:  ShengXing Zheng; Wenwen Zheng; Tianqi Zhu; Haiyan Lan; Qian Wang; Xiao Sun; MingPin Hu
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Comparison Between the Use of Ropivacaine Alone and Ropivacaine With Sufentanil in Epidural Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  Xian Wang; Shiqin Xu; Xiang Qin; Xiaohong Li; Shan-Wu Feng; Yusheng Liu; Wei Wang; Xirong Guo; Rong Shen; Xiaofeng Shen; Fuzhou Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.