Literature DB >> 15495060

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis.

K Ayub1, R Imada, J Slavin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP+/-ES) has been advocated to reduce complications in patients presenting with a severe attack of gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP). However, a recent trial has reported contradictory results. Importantly, patients with acute cholangitis were excluded suggesting it may be a major confounding factor affecting previous studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of early ERCP+/-ES compared to conservative management stratified according to severity of disease, concealment of randomisation, acute cholangitis and bilirubin level in the reduction of mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalisation and cost in adults suspected of having GAP. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched - Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2003), Medline (1966-2004), EMBASE (1980-2004) and LILACS. 'Grey literature' was sought by looking at cited references and hand searched to identify further relevant trials. Conference proceedings of United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were also hand searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adult patients, from 15 years old or greater, presenting with gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP) comparing ERCP +/- ES versus Conservative management within 72 hours of admission. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were assessed for quality independently by two reviewers. Wherever appropriate, results were pooled together and sub-grouped by predicted severity of disease. Fixed and random effects models were applied. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the fragility of results. MAIN
RESULTS: Three trials, involving 511 patients, met inclusion criteria. The test for heterogeneity yielded statistically non-significant results (p-value 0.1 to 0.63) suggesting all comparisons were above the established threshold for combinability (p<0.1). Fixed effect and random effect meta-analyses gave identical results. Early ERCP +/- ES was associated with non-significant effect on reduction of mortality in predicted mild (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41) and severe GAP (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41). Reduction in complications was non-significant in predicted mild (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.53 to 1.49), but significant in severe GAP (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.53). There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions about hospital stay and cost. REVIEWERS'
CONCLUSIONS: Odds of having complications are reduced in predicted severe disease by early ERCP +/- ES. This effect was however, non-significant in predicted mild disease and for reduction of mortality in either predicted mild or severe disease. These results are controlled for confounding due to associated acute cholangitis and are robust for clinical and statistical heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15495060     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003630.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Dimitrios J Kapetanos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-01-16

3.  UK guidelines for management of acute pancreatitis: is it time to change?

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; M Farouk; J H Tweedie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth; Derek O'Reilly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

Review 5.  Biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  George Sarosi; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A young woman with gallstone pancreatitis and abnormal liver tests: when is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography needed?

Authors:  Andrew D Rhim; Michael L Kochman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Population-based observational study of acute pancreatitis in southern England.

Authors:  Alex Mirnezami; Ben Knight; Brendan Moran; Fergus Noble; Graham Branagan; John Primrose; Katherine Pearson; Malcolm West; Nathan Curtis; Phil Pucher; Ramsey Cuttress; Sian Pugh; Tim Underwood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  [Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Current recommendations].

Authors:  W Huber; R M Schmid
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gianluca Rompianesi; Angus Hann; Oluyemi Komolafe; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 10.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.