Literature DB >> 15495022

Central action beta-blockers versus placebo for neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia.

A R Lima, J Bacalcthuk, T R E Barnes, K Soares-Weiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic-induced akathisia is a common, distressing early-onset adverse effect of neuroleptic drugs. It has been associated with poor treatment compliance and an increased risk of relapse.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of central action beta-blockers compared with placebo for people with neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (May 1999), Biological Abstracts (January 1982-March 1999), The Cochrane Library (issue 3 1999), EMBASE (January 1980-March 1999), LILACS (January 1982-March 1999), MEDLINE (January 1964-March 1999), PsycLIT (January 1974-March 1999), and SCISEARCH by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (November 2003). We sought further references from published trials and their authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled clinical trials of central action beta-blockers versus placebo for people with neuroleptic-induced acute akathisia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Working independently, we selected and critically appraised studies, extracted data and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Where possible and appropriate we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the number needed to treat (NNT). For continuous data we calculated Weighted Mean Differences (WMD). MAIN
RESULTS: We identified three randomised controlled trials (total n=51, maximum duration 72 hours). We were not able to draw any firm conclusions from such a small data set. In the two 48 hour studies no-one experienced full remission of akathisia, and only one person in each group experienced a 50% remission (n=11, 1 RCT, RR 1.04 CI 0.59 -1.83). One trial stated that no adverse effects occurred in the two groups (n=20, 1 RCT, RR not estimable). The 72 hour study did not show any statistical difference between the central acting beta-blocker (ICI 118,551) and placebo for the outcome 'no change/worse' (n=10, RR 0.22 CI 0.0 to 1.5). REVIEWERS'
CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient data to recommend beta-blocking drugs for akathisia. These drugs are experimental for this problem, and this review highlights the need for more evaluative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15495022      PMCID: PMC6599862          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001946.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  36 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A placebo-controlled trial of nadolol in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Authors:  B G Wells; J A Cold; P A Marken; C S Brown; C C Chu; R P Johnson; C S Nasdahl; M A Ayubi; D H Knott; K L Arheart
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Propranolol as a primary treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Authors:  M Irwin; G Sullivan; T Van Putten
Journal:  Hillside J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1988

4.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

5.  A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects.

Authors:  G M Simpson; J W Angus
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1970

6.  Propranolol in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia (NIA) in schizophrenics: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  M S Kramer; R A Gorkin; C DiJohnson; P Sheves
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Efficacy of betaxolol in neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Authors:  L A Adler; B Angrist; J Rotrosen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Lack of efficacy of d-propranolol in neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Authors:  L A Adler; B Angrist; P Fritz; J Rotrosen; G Mallya; J F Lipinski
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A controlled assessment of propranolol in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Authors:  L Adler; B Angrist; E Peselow; J Corwin; R Maslansky; J Rotrosen
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Modern antipsychotic drugs: a critical overview.

Authors:  David M Gardner; Ross J Baldessarini; Paul Waraich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Management of common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications.

Authors:  T Scott Stroup; Neil Gray
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology: "Guideline for Pharmacological Therapy of Schizophrenia".

Authors: 
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-08-12

Review 5.  Mirtazapine for antipsychotic-induced acute akathisia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Samir Kumar Praharaj; Sreejayan Kongasseri; Rishikesh V Behere; Podila Satya Venkata Narasimha Sharma
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-10

6.  The Assessment and Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Akathisia.

Authors:  Tamara Pringsheim; David Gardner; Donald Addington; Davide Martino; Francesca Morgante; Lucia Ricciardi; Norman Poole; Gary Remington; Mark Edwards; Alan Carson; Thomas R E Barnes
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 7.  Revisiting Antipsychotic-induced Akathisia: Current Issues and Prospective Challenges.

Authors:  Haitham Salem; Caesa Nagpal; Teresa Pigott; Antonio Lucio Teixeira
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.363

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.