OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of patients for whom it is decided to forgo artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) and characteristics of the ANH decision-making process. We conducted an observational study with the use of written questionnaires. For 178 nursing home patients with dementia, the treating nursing home physician (NHP), a family member, and a nurse filled out a questionnaire directly after the decision was made to forgo ANH. RESULTS: We found that most patients had severe dementia and two thirds had an acute illness. Advance care planning had taken place in 68% of the cases. In two thirds of the cases, the primary aim in forgoing ANH was to avoid unnecessary prolongation of life; and nurses seemed to have less influence on the decision-making process than NHPs and family members. Almost all respondents evaluated the decision-making process as "good" or "adequate." Dissatisfaction was felt when the decision had to be made under the pressure of time constraint. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we recommend that discussions that include NHPs, family members, and nurses concerning decisions about possible future situations be held on a regular basis. This will form the basis for the difficult ANH decision and will probably reduce the pressure of time constraint.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of patients for whom it is decided to forgo artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) and characteristics of the ANH decision-making process. We conducted an observational study with the use of written questionnaires. For 178 nursing home patients with dementia, the treating nursing home physician (NHP), a family member, and a nurse filled out a questionnaire directly after the decision was made to forgo ANH. RESULTS: We found that most patients had severe dementia and two thirds had an acute illness. Advance care planning had taken place in 68% of the cases. In two thirds of the cases, the primary aim in forgoing ANH was to avoid unnecessary prolongation of life; and nurses seemed to have less influence on the decision-making process than NHPs and family members. Almost all respondents evaluated the decision-making process as "good" or "adequate." Dissatisfaction was felt when the decision had to be made under the pressure of time constraint. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, we recommend that discussions that include NHPs, family members, and nurses concerning decisions about possible future situations be held on a regular basis. This will form the basis for the difficult ANH decision and will probably reduce the pressure of time constraint.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach