Literature DB >> 15493565

Efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in improving oocyte quality in assisted reproductive techniques.

Kang Woo Cheon1, Hye Kyung Byun, Kwang Moon Yang, In Ok Song, Kyu Hong Choi, Keun Jai Yoo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus highly purified urinary human FSH (uFSH) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, quality of retrieved double-blind study compared uFSH with rFSH in IVF-ET rFSh cycles. A total of 254 cycles from 241 patients who attended the infertility clinic at Samsung Cheil Hospital from January to August 2001 were included in the study. With pituitary desensitization using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and a short protocol, rFSH was administered in 131 cycles; uFSH was administered in 123 cycles. We analyzed ovarian response, oocyte quality, fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the uFSH and rFSH groups.
RESULTS: Total FSH dosage (1322.3 +/- 526.2 vs. 2124.4 +/- 881.9 i.u.) and dosage per retrieved oocyte (90.6 +/- 36.0 vs. 138.0 +/- 57.2 i.u.) were significantly lower in the rFSH group than those in the uFSH group (P < .001). The proportion of good-quality oocytes (grade 1 and 2) was higher in the rFSH group (68.2% vs. 64.8%, P = .024). Moreover, the proportion of atretic oocytes (grade 5) was lower in the rFSH group (7.5% vs. 10.3%, P = .002). The fertilization rate, quality of transferred embryos, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were not significantly differ between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: In women undergoing COH, rFSH revealed more efficient ovarian response and better quality of oocytes than did uFSH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15493565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  The cumulative live birth rate of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alfa verse urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Chunxia Yang; Naijun Dong; Feng Li; Yurong Ji; Yu Pan; Hong She
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.506

Review 2.  Urinary Versus Recombinant Gonadotropins for Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Ameet Patki; Himanshu Bavishi; Chandravati Kumari; Jayarani Kamraj; M Venugopal; K U Kunjimoideen; Poornima Nadkarni; Samundi Sankari; Sunil Chaudhary; M J Sangeeta; C S Manjunath; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

3.  Differential FSH Glycosylation Modulates FSHR Oligomerization and Subsequent cAMP Signaling.

Authors:  Uchechukwu T Agwuegbo; Emily Colley; Anthony P Albert; Viktor Y Butnev; George R Bousfield; Kim C Jonas
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Kang Woo Cheon; Sang Jin Song; Bum Chae Choi; Seung Chul Lee; Hong Bok Lee; Seung Youn Yu; Keun Jai Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Intrauterine insemination as a primary viable option to infertile couples: evaluation of patients in a private center.

Authors:  Marília Porto Bonow; Ricardo Ditzel Delle Donne; Vinicius Bonato da Rosa; José Augusto Lucca; Cristian Maio Hillesheim; Alessandro Schuffner
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-10-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.