Literature DB >> 15492655

Is umbilical flora responsible for wound infection after laparoscopic surgery?

Ismail Hamzaoglu1, Bilgi Baca, Deniz Eren Böler, Erdal Polat, Yasemin Ozer.   

Abstract

To our knowledge, the association of umbilical flora and infections has not been studied yet. The aim of this study was to identify the causative agents for trocar site infections and to highlight whether there is association between umbilical flora and trocar site infections. One hundred consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery were studied. Microbiological samples were taken from the umbilicus before (group 1) and after (group 2) antisepsis with povidone-iodine. Microbiological assessment was done for wounds suspected to be infected, and the wounds with positive cultures were classified as group 3. The incidence of wound infection was 8%. One hundred percent of the infections were associated with the extraction trocar. Eighty-nine percent of all of the infections occurred after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas 11% occurred after laparoscopic appendectomy. The micro-organisms in group 3 did not belong to the skin flora, unlike the micro-organisms in groups 1 and 2, but hospital-acquired pathogens were responsible for the infections. The umbilical flora and the bile are not the source of the surgical site infections after laparoscopic surgery in our study despite the considerations in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15492655     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200410000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  7 in total

1.  A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae.

Authors:  T A Solomon; Padma Wignesvaran; Mohammed A Chaudry; Matthew G Tutton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Port site infection in laparoscopic surgery: A review of its management.

Authors:  Prakash K Sasmal; Tushar S Mishra; Satyajit Rath; Susanta Meher; Dipti Mohapatra
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Transumbilical abdominal incision for laparoscopic colorectal surgery does not increase the risk of postoperative surgical site infection.

Authors:  Mizunori Yaegashi; Koki Otsuka; Toshimoto Kimura; Masanori Hakozaki; Megumu Kamishima; Tomoki Hatanaka; Kei Sato; Hitoshi Fujii; Teppei Matsuo; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Postoperative Symptoms, after-care, and return to routine activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anand P Tamhankar; Fayyaz Mazari; Jide Olubaniyi; Nick Everitt; Krish Ravi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  The role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Uludag; Gurkan Yetkin; Bulent Citgez
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Umbilical port-site complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: role of topical antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Neri; Alberto Fersini; Antonio Ambrosi; Nicola Tartaglia; Tiziano Pio Valentino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Wound complications following laparoscopic surgery in a nigerian hospital.

Authors:  Adewale O Adisa; Olusegun I Alatise; Elugwaraonu A Agbakwuru; David O Akinola; Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2014-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.