Literature DB >> 15492047

The validity of subscores for a credentialing test.

Thomas M Haladyna1, Gene A Kramer.   

Abstract

Subscores resulting from the administration of high-stakes tests to candidates for credentials in the health professions are desirable for two reasons. First, failing candidates want a profile of performance to plan future remedial studies. Second, training institutions want a profile of performance for their graduates to better evaluate their training. The validity of the interpretation or use of subscores depends on a summative judgment based on a combination of reasoning and empirical analyses, known as validation. We describe this reasoning process and show that with a large credentialing test the validity of any subscore interpretation or use can and should be studied systematically. Validity evidence should be established to support the interpretation and use of subscores that we intend to report. Some principles arise in this study related to the validity of subscores, and some procedures are proposed to help testing program personnel better validate the use of subscores.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15492047     DOI: 10.1177/0163278704270010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  3 in total

1.  Indices of Subscore Utility for Individuals and Subgroups Based on Multivariate Generalizability Theory.

Authors:  Mark R Raymond; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 2.  Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments.

Authors:  Moshe Feldman; Elizabeth H Lazzara; Allison A Vanderbilt; Deborah DiazGranados
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  A Comprehensive, Multi-modal Evaluation of the Assessment System of an Undergraduate Research Methodology Course: Translating Theory into Practice.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Gominda G Ponnamperuma; Farah Ahmad; Zubair Amin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.088

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.