Literature DB >> 15491741

Prostate cancer molecular markers GSTP1 and hTERT in expressed prostatic secretions as predictors of biopsy results.

Laura E Crocitto1, Darlynn Korns, Leo Kretzner, Taras Shevchuk, Sarah L Blair, Timothy G Wilson, Soroush A Ramin, Mark H Kawachi, Steven S Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop noninvasive diagnostic tools for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Current screening for PCa lacks sensitivity and specificity. Two molecular markers, telomerase activity and aberrant methylation of the glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) promoter, are found in more than 90% of PCa specimens. Additionally, these markers can be detected in bodily fluids such as urine and postprostatic massage urethral washes.
METHODS: Expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) from men being evaluated for PCa were analyzed for human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression (the critical factor for telomerase activity) and GSTP1 methylation status. The results were compared with the prostate needle biopsy findings.
RESULTS: EPS could be obtained from 86% of all subjects, and 90% of these samples yielded sufficient RNA and/or DNA for assaying. hTERT expression from EPS (n = 49) had 36% sensitivity and 66% specificity, and GSTP1 methylation from EPS (n = 58) had 46% sensitivity and 56% specificity for the detection of PCa. The combined analysis (n = 32) of hTERT and GSTP1 had 73% sensitivity and 43% specificity, giving a positive predictive value of 40% and a negative predictive value of 75%.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that EPS can be successfully obtained and easily tested for hTERT expression and GSTP1 methylation. Tests with a high negative predictive value, such as our combination assay results, could be useful in augmenting current PCa diagnostic procedures. For example, the examination of EPS for hTERT and GSTP1 methylation in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level might be used in predicting which patients will have negative biopsies. The use of this assay could potentially eliminate up to 30% of costly and invasive needle biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15491741     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  The influence of PSA-RNA yield on the analysis of expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Christopher Whelan; Laura Crocitto; Mark Kawachi; Kevin Chan; David Smith; Timothy Wilson; Steven Smith
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.344

2.  Proteomics cataloging analysis of human expressed prostatic secretions reveals rich source of biomarker candidates.

Authors:  Runsheng Li; Yan Guo; Bang Ming Han; Xiaowei Yan; Angelita G Utleg; Wei Li; Lan Chun Tu; Jian Wang; Leroy Hood; Shujie Xia; Biaoyang Lin
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Urine biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Performance of a single assay for both type III and type VI TMPRSS2:ERG fusions in noninvasive prediction of prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  Jarrod P Clark; Kristofer W Munson; Jessie W Gu; Katarzyna Lamparska-Kupsik; Kevin G Chan; Jeffrey S Yoshida; Mark H Kawachi; Laura E Crocitto; Timothy G Wilson; Ziding Feng; Steven S Smith
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric Schiffer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Expressed prostatic secretion biomarkers improve stratification of NCCN active surveillance candidates: performance of secretion capacity and TMPRSS2:ERG models.

Authors:  Christopher Whelan; Mark Kawachi; David D Smith; Jennifer Linehan; Gail Babilonia; Rosa Mejia; Timothy Wilson; Steven S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Measurement of GSTP1 promoter methylation in body fluids may complement PSA screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Wu; E Giovannucci; J Welge; P Mallick; W-Y Tang; S-M Ho
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Recovery of bisulfite-converted genomic sequences in the methylation-sensitive QPCR.

Authors:  Kristofer Munson; Jarrod Clark; Katarzyna Lamparska-Kupsik; Steven S Smith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Can urinary exosomes act as treatment response markers in prostate cancer?

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell; Joanne Welton; John Staffurth; Jacquelyn Court; Malcolm D Mason; Zsuzsanna Tabi; Aled Clayton
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Accurate quantification of DNA methylation using combined bisulfite restriction analysis coupled with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer platform.

Authors:  Romulo Martin Brena; Herbert Auer; Karl Kornacker; Björn Hackanson; Aparna Raval; John C Byrd; Christoph Plass
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.