Literature DB >> 15491592

Endectocide exchanges between grazing cattle after pour-on administration of doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin.

Alain Bousquet-Mélou1, Sonia Mercadier, Michel Alvinerie, Pierre-Louis Toutain.   

Abstract

Self-licking behaviour in cattle has recently been identified as a determinant of the kinetic disposition of topically-administered ivermectin. In the present study, we document the occurrence and extent of transfer between cattle of three topically-administered endectocides, as a consequence of allo-licking. Four groups of two Holstein cows each received one pour-on formulation of doramectin, ivermectin, or moxidectin, or no treatment. The cows were then kept together in a paddock. Systemic exposure to each topically-administered endectocide was observed in at least five of six non-treated cattle. Plasma and faecal drug concentration profiles in non-treated animals were highly variable between animals and within an animal, and sometimes attained those observed in treated animals. Drug exchanges were quantified by measuring plasma and faecal clearances after simultaneous i.v. administration of the three drugs as a cocktail. Plasma clearances were 185+/-43, 347+/-77 and 636+/-130ml/kg/day, faecal clearances representing 75+/-26, 28+/-13, and 39+/-30% of the plasma clearance for doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. The amount of drug ingested by non-treated cattle attained 1.3-21.3% (doramectin), 1.3-16.1% (ivermectin), 2.4-10.6% (moxidectin) of a pour-on dose (500 microg/kg). The total amount of drug ingested by all non-treated cattle represented 29% (doramectin), 19% (ivermectin), and 8.6% (moxidectin) of the total amount of each drug poured on the backs of treated animals. The cumulative amounts of endectocide ingested by each non-treated cow ranged from 1.3 to 27.4% of a pour-on dose. Oral bioavailability after drug ingestion due to allo-licking was 13.5+/-9.4, 17.5+/-3.5 and 26.1+/-11.1% for doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively. The extent of drug exchange demonstrated here raises concerns for drug efficacy and safety, emergence of drug resistance, presence of unexpectedly high residue levels in treated and/or untreated animals and high environmental burdens. Moreover, scientific and regulatory aspects of clinical and bioequivalence trials for topical drug administration in cattle should be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15491592     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  11 in total

1.  Ivermectin use and resulting milk residues on 4 Canadian dairy herds.

Authors:  Alan L Chicoine; David A Durden; George MacNaughton; Patricia M Dowling
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Effect of macrocyclic lactones on nontarget coprophilic organisms: a review.

Authors:  M Junco; L E Iglesias; M F Sagués; I Guerrero; S Zegbi; C A Saumell
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  The efficacy of pour-on ivermectin in bison (Bison bison).

Authors:  Murray R Woodbury; W Roy Lewis
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Reevaluation of efficacy against nematode parasites and pharmacokinetics of topical eprinomectin in cattle.

Authors:  Steffen Rehbein; Martin Visser; Michael Kellermann; Laura Letendre
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Pharmacokinetics and anthelmintic efficacy of topical eprinomectin in goats prevented from grooming.

Authors:  Steffen Rehbein; Michael Kellermann; Teresa A Wehner
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  The effect of self-licking behavior on pharmacokinetics of eprinomectin and clinical efficacy against Psoroptes cuniculi in topically administered rabbits.

Authors:  Huiqiang Wen; Baoliang Pan; Fangfei Wang; Zhenzhong Yang; Zhujun Wang; Shuai Liu; Ming Wang
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  Moxidectin and the avermectins: Consanguinity but not identity.

Authors:  Roger Prichard; Cécile Ménez; Anne Lespine
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chlorpyrifos in male and female cattle after topical administration.

Authors:  Eduardo J Picco; Marcelo R Rubio; Diego C Díaz David; Casilda Rodríguez; Juan C Boggio
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 9.  Perspectives on the utility of moxidectin for the control of parasitic nematodes in the face of developing anthelmintic resistance.

Authors:  Roger K Prichard; Timothy G Geary
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 10.  Drug resistance in liver flukes.

Authors:  I Fairweather; G P Brennan; R E B Hanna; M W Robinson; P J Skuce
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.