Literature DB >> 154914

Pre- and postoperative left ventricular contractile function in patients with aortic valve disease.

H P Krayenbuehl, M Turina, O M Hess, M Rothlin, A Senning.   

Abstract

In 43 patients left ventricular micromanometry and cineangiography were performed preoperatively and and 20 months after aortic valve replacement. A score of left ventricular functional impairment, derived from 5 to 8 haemodynamic variables, was calculated as: number of pathological indices x 100/total number of determined indices. Preoperatively the score of left ventricular functional impairment amounted to 35 per cent in group 1 (aortic stenosis: n = 19), to 61 per cent in group 2 (combined lesion:n = 15) (P less than 0.05), and to 87 per cent in group 3 (aortic regurgitation: n = 9) (P less than 0.001). In contrast, the functional classification according to the NYHA showed similar impairment in the 3 groups. Postoperatively the score of left ventricular functional impairment decreased significantly in all 3 groups to 10, 16, and 27 per cent, respectively, but the score of group 3 remained raised (P less than 0.05) as compared with that of group 1. The patients with residual left ventricular dysfunction had a higher preoperative left ventricular muscle mass than the patients with normal or near normal postoperative left ventricular function. It is concluded that (1) at similar functional impairment according to the NYHA classification left ventricular contractile function is more severely impaired in aortic regurgitation and in aortic regurgitation + aortic stenosis than in aortic stenosis alone, (2) left ventricular function improves significantly after valve replacement in all three forms of aortic valve disease, (3) residual functional impairment is greater in aortic regurgitation than in aortic stenosis or aortic stenosis + aortic regurgitation, and (4) persistent postoperative left ventricular functional impairment is found in the patients with severe preoperative hypertrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 154914      PMCID: PMC486855          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.41.2.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  20 in total

1.  Isolated replacement of the aortic valve with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis. A 9 year review.

Authors:  D A Barnhorst; H A Oxman; D C Connolly; J R Pluth; G K Danielson; R B Wallace; D C McGoon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Myocardial ultrastructure in patients with chronic aortic valve disease.

Authors:  B J Maron; V J Ferrans; W C Roberts
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  A METHOD FOR DETERMINING LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS IN MAN.

Authors:  C E RACKLEY; H T DODGE; Y D COBLE; R E HAY
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Current concepts in cardiology. Derived indexes of ventricular and myocardial function.

Authors:  E H Sonnenblick; J E Strobeck
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cardiac function following prosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  H N Hultgren; H Hubis; N Shumway
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Five years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc valve in isolated aortic valvular disease.

Authors:  V O Björk; A Henze; A Holmgren
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Indices predicting long-term survival after valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation and patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J W Hirshfeld; S E Epstein; A J Roberts; D L Glancy; A G Morrow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  High-fidelity left ventricular pressure measurements for the assessment of cardiac contractility in man.

Authors:  H P Krayenbuehl; W Rutishauser; P Wirz; I Amende; H Mehmel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Hemodynamic changes following correction of severe aortic stenosis using the Cutter-Smeloff prosthesis.

Authors:  S J Lee; M Haraphongse; J C Callaghan; R E Rossall; R S Fraser
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The evaluation of left ventricular function in man. A comparison of methods.

Authors:  T H Kreulen; A A Bove; M T McDonough; M J Sands; J F Spann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

1.  The novel two-dimensional strain reflects improvement and remodeling of left-ventricular function better than conventional echocardiographic parameters after aortic valve repair in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yaping Mi; Tanja Rädle-Hurst; Axel Rentzsch; Diana Aicher; Hans Joachim Schäfers; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Hypertension in aortic valve disease and its response to valve replacement.

Authors:  A Zezulka; J Mackinnon; D G Beevers
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Changes in left ventricular filling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M C Herregods; B Denef; A Aubert; H de Geest
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

4.  Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Suad Catovic; Zoran B Popovic; Nebojsa Tasic; Dusko Nezic; Predrag Milojevic; Bosko Djukanovic; Sinisa Gradinac; Lazar Angelkov; Petar Otasevic
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Inyoung Song; Sung Min Ko; Jeong Geun Yi; Hyun Keun Chee; Jun Seok Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.