BACKGROUND: Attitude toward medications is important for medication adherence. A patient's drug attitude probably reflects a weighing of benefits against experienced or anticipated side effects or risks associated with the medication. We predicted (1) that drug attitudes would be more positive among schizophrenia patients taking second-generation compared to first-generation antipsychotics because of their greater tolerability and efficacy; and (2) that greater insight into illness, fewer extrapyramidal symptoms, and better social functioning would be associated with better attitudes toward psychiatric medication. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study of 81 DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia outpatients, we used multivariate analysis to determine clinical and demographic predictors of drug attitude. Drug attitude was assessed with the 10-item Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The relationship between the DAI and psychopathology, insight, extrapyramidal symptoms, level of functioning, and type of antipsychotic (first-generation versus second-generation versus clozapine) was examined. RESULTS: Less awareness of current symptoms, presence of deficit symptoms, and employment predicted a negative attitude toward psychiatric medications. Extrapyramidal symptoms did not predict drug attitude. Drug attitudes were no different between patients taking first- or second-generation antipsychotics or clozapine. CONCLUSION: Patients may not favor second-generation over first-generation antipsychotics, and extrapyramidal symptoms may not be a primary factor determining attitudes. While attitudes may be more positive in patients who recognize therapeutic drug effects, patients who work may view medications particularly negatively, possibly due to a sense of stigma. Because drug attitudes may reflect compliance and are difficult to predict, clinicians should inquire directly.
BACKGROUND: Attitude toward medications is important for medication adherence. A patient's drug attitude probably reflects a weighing of benefits against experienced or anticipated side effects or risks associated with the medication. We predicted (1) that drug attitudes would be more positive among schizophreniapatients taking second-generation compared to first-generation antipsychotics because of their greater tolerability and efficacy; and (2) that greater insight into illness, fewer extrapyramidal symptoms, and better social functioning would be associated with better attitudes toward psychiatric medication. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study of 81 DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia outpatients, we used multivariate analysis to determine clinical and demographic predictors of drug attitude. Drug attitude was assessed with the 10-item Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The relationship between the DAI and psychopathology, insight, extrapyramidal symptoms, level of functioning, and type of antipsychotic (first-generation versus second-generation versus clozapine) was examined. RESULTS: Less awareness of current symptoms, presence of deficit symptoms, and employment predicted a negative attitude toward psychiatric medications. Extrapyramidal symptoms did not predict drug attitude. Drug attitudes were no different between patients taking first- or second-generation antipsychotics or clozapine. CONCLUSION:Patients may not favor second-generation over first-generation antipsychotics, and extrapyramidal symptoms may not be a primary factor determining attitudes. While attitudes may be more positive in patients who recognize therapeutic drug effects, patients who work may view medications particularly negatively, possibly due to a sense of stigma. Because drug attitudes may reflect compliance and are difficult to predict, clinicians should inquire directly.
Authors: Peter F Buckley; Donna A Wirshing; Prameet Bhushan; Joseph M Pierre; Seth A Resnick; William C Wirshing Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Christian G Widschwendter; Georg Kemmler; Maria A Rettenbacher; Nursen Yalcin-Siedentopf; Alex Hofer Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: John H Krystal; D Cyril D'Souza; Jürgen Gallinat; Naomi Driesen; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Ismene Petrakis; Andreas Heinz; Godfrey Pearlson Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Hong Liu-Seifert; David H Adams; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Douglas E Faries; Bruce J Kinon Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 2.711