Literature DB >> 15490923

Access to colposcopy services for high-risk Canadian women: can we do better?

Gina S Ogilvie1, Elizabeth A Shaw, Sandra P Lusk, Joyce Zazulak, Janusz A Kaczorowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite overall decreasing mortality from cervical cancer, selected groups of Canadian women continue to have suboptimal access to diagnostic and treatment interventions for cervical cancer. In this paper, we present an evaluation of a colposcopy program developed to improve attendance for colposcopy in a lower socio-economic and immigrant population.
METHODS: All women attending the North Hamilton Community Health Centre (CHC) who required colposcopic assessment and were referred to a newly developed colposcopy program based at the CHC were evaluated. Attendance rates for consultation, follow up and treatment in women referred for colposcopy were compared retrospectively for the CHC-based colposcopy program and concurrently with the regional colposcopy clinic (RCC).
RESULTS: Women referred to the CHC colposcopy program had a significant reduction in their no-show rate after the introduction of the locally based colposcopy program (17.2% vs. 1.3%, p<0.01). Comparing the same time periods, there was no significant reduction in the default rate at the RCC (2.5% vs. 3.3%, p=0.21). Despite serving a population of women who were at higher risk for non-attendance, patients at the CHC had a default rate for appointments similar to that of the RCC (1.3% vs. 3.3%, p=0.55) after the introduction of the local colposcopy program.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower socio-economic status and immigrant women receiving care from a CHC-based colposcopy program had a significant decrease in their no-show rate for colposcopic evaluation after the introduction of the on-site program. Consideration must be given to locating diagnostic colposcopy programs in settings more accessible to women who require these services the most.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15490923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  5 in total

1.  Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Monika Krzyzanowska; Refik Saskin; Lisa Barbera; Asma Razzaq; Aisha Lofters; Naira Yeritsyan; Arlene Bierman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Treatment patterns among medicaid-eligible women with breast cancer in georgia: are patterns different under the breast and cervical cancer prevention and treatment act?

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Li-Nien Chien; Sheryl G A Gabram-Mendola
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Feasibility of self-collection of specimens for human papillomavirus testing in hard-to-reach women.

Authors:  Gina Ogilvie; Mel Krajden; Juanita Maginley; Judy Isaac-Renton; Greg Hislop; Ruth Elwood-Martin; Chris Sherlock; Darlene Taylor; Michael Rekart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The impact of decentralising colposcopy services from tertiary-level to primary-level care in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa: a before and after study.

Authors:  Gloria Maimela; Xolisile Nene; Nontuthuko Mvundla; Shobna Sawry; Trudy Smith; Helen Rees; Elizabeth Kachingwe; Matthew Chersich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.