Literature DB >> 15490898

Discourse complexity of college writers with and without disabilities: a multidimensional analysis.

Noel Gregg1, Chris Coleman, Robert B Stennett, Mark Davis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine specific word- and sentence-level features most frequently used in the expository writing of four groups of college writers. Three groups were writers who demonstrated disabilities. Group 1 students (n = 87) demonstrated learning disabilities (LD); Group 2 (n = 50), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); and Group 3 (n = 58), combined LD and ADHD. Group 4 consisted of writers with no history of a documented disability (n = 92). Computer-based analysis and structural equation modeling were used to group specific linguistic features identified in the expository essays across all four groups. The frequency of linguistic features, not errors, was analyzed. Four communication dimensions (factors) were identified for the four groups of writers, but the factor loadings and correlations were significantly different across groups. Furthermore, the relationships of specific linguistic features were studied as to their impact on the verbosity, quality, and lexical complexity of students' expository essays. It is interesting to note that very high correlations were found between verbosity, quality, and lexical complexity, suggesting that these constructs are not as separate in their functioning as might be supposed. Implications for assessment and instruction are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15490898     DOI: 10.1177/002221940203500103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  4 in total

1.  Towards an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and gender gap in written composition.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek; Brandy Gatlin
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits.

Authors:  Janice M Keenan; Chelsea E Meenan
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-03-21

Review 4.  Developmental context and treatment principles for ADHD among college students.

Authors:  Andrew P Fleming; Robert J McMahon
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.