Literature DB >> 15490290

Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens).

Josep Call1, Malinda Carpenter, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

There is currently much debate about the nature of social learning in chimpanzees. The main question is whether they can copy others' actions, as opposed to reproducing the environmental effects of these actions using their own preexisting behavioral strategies. In the current study, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) were shown different demonstrations of how to open a tube-in both cases by a conspecific. In different experimental conditions, demonstrations consisted of (1) action only (the actions necessary to open the tube without actually opening it); (2) end state only (the open tube, without showing any actions); (3) both of these components (in a full demonstration); or (4) neither of these components (in a baseline condition). In the first three conditions subjects saw one of two different ways that the tube could open (break in middle; caps off ends). Subjects' behavior in each condition was assessed for how often they opened the tube, how often they opened it in the same location as the demonstrator, and how often they copied the demonstrator's actions or style of opening the tube. Whereas chimpanzees reproduced mainly the environmental results of the demonstrations (emulation), human children often reproduced the demonstrator's actions (imitation). Because the procedure used was similar in many ways to the procedure that Meltzoff (Dev Psych 31:1, 1995) used to study the understanding of others' unfulfilled intentions, the implications of these findings with regard to chimpanzees' understanding of others' intentions are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15490290     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0237-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  34 in total

1.  Social learning in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Jennifer C Holzhaider; Gavin R Hunt; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The hidden structure of overimitation.

Authors:  Derek E Lyons; Andrew G Young; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  From monkey mirror neurons to primate behaviours: possible 'direct' and 'indirect' pathways.

Authors:  P F Ferrari; L Bonini; L Fogassi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Modeling imitation and emulation in constrained search spaces.

Authors:  Alberto Acerbi; Claudio Tennie; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity.

Authors:  Cristine H Legare
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dogs do not demonstrate a human-like bias to defer to communicative cues.

Authors:  Angie M Johnston; Yiyun Huang; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Evidence for emulation in chimpanzees in social settings using the floating peanut task.

Authors:  Claudio Tennie; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Andrew Whiten; Nicola McGuigan; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  In-group conformity sustains different foraging traditions in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Marietta Dindo; Andrew Whiten; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying social learning in animal populations: a new 'option-bias' method.

Authors:  Rachel L Kendal; Jeremy R Kendal; Will Hoppitt; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.