Literature DB >> 15490132

Human 3-D aVOR with and without otolith stimulation.

Christopher J Bockisch1, Dominik Straumann, Thomas Haslwanter.   

Abstract

We describe in detail the frequency response of the human three-dimensional angular vestibulo-ocular response (3-D aVOR) over a frequency range of 0.05-1 Hz. Gain and phase of the human aVOR were determined for passive head rotations in the dark, with the rotation axis either aligned with or perpendicular to the direction of gravity (earth-vertical or earth-horizontal). In the latter case, the oscillations dynamically stimulated both the otolith organs and the semi-circular canals. We conducted experiments in pitch and yaw, and compared the results with previously-published roll data. Regardless of the axis of rotation and the orientation of the subject, the gain in aVOR increased with frequency to about 0.3 Hz, and was approximately constant from 0.3 to 1 Hz. The aVOR gain during pitch and yaw rotations was larger than during roll rotations. Otolith and canal cues combined differently depending upon the axis of rotation: for torsional and pitch rotations, aVOR gain was higher with otolith input; for yaw rotations the aVOR was not affected by otolith stimulation. There was a phase lead in all three dimensions for frequencies below 0.3 Hz when only the canals were stimulated. For roll and pitch rotations this phase lead vanished with dynamic otolith stimulation. In contrast, the horizontal phase showed no improvement with additional otolith input during yaw rotations. The lack of a significant otolith contribution to the yaw aVOR was observed when subjects were supine, prone or lying on their sides. Our results confirm studies with less-natural stimuli (off-vertical axis rotation) that the otoliths contribute a head-rotation signal to the aVOR. However, the magnitude of the contribution depends on the axis of rotation, with the gain in otolith-canal cross-coupling being smallest for yaw axis rotations. This could be because, in humans, typical yaw head movements will stimulate the otoliths to a much lesser extent then typical pitch and roll head movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15490132     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  The three-dimensional vestibulo-ocular reflex during prolonged microgravity.

Authors:  A H Clarke; J Grigull; R Mueller; H Scherer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Convergence of the horizontal semicircular canal and otolith afferents on cat single vestibular neurons.

Authors:  X Zhang; M Zakir; H Meng; H Sato; Y Uchino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inactivation of semicircular canals causes adaptive increases in otolith-driven tilt responses.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Shawn D Newlands; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex during combined linear and angular acceleration.

Authors:  B T Crane; E S Viirre; J L Demer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Crucial effects of weightlessness on human orientation.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt; S Glasauer
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex during whole-body oscillation in the upright and the supine position. I. Responses in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  A Schmid-Priscoveanu; D Straumann; A A Kori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt.

Authors:  C Darlot; P Denise; J Droulez; B Cohen; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. I. Gain matrices.

Authors:  D Tweed; D Sievering; H Misslisch; M Fetter; D Zee; E Koenig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  12 in total

1.  Canal and otolith contributions to compensatory tilt responses in pigeons.

Authors:  Kimberly L McArthur; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Dependence of the roll angular vestibuloocular reflex (aVOR) on gravity.

Authors:  Sergei B Yakushin; Yongqing Xiang; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Development of a conversion model between mechanical and electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  A Chen; N Khosravi-Hashemi; C Kuo; J K Kramer; J-S Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Velocity storage in the human vertical rotational vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  G Bertolini; S Ramat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Three-dimensional analysis of linear vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans during eccentric rotation while facing downwards.

Authors:  Takao Imai; Yasumitsu Takimoto; Noriaki Takeda; Tomoko Okumura; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Peaks and troughs of three-dimensional vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  Janine Goumans; Mark M J Houben; Joyce Dits; Johannes van der Steen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-23

7.  Self-motion direction discrimination in the visually impaired.

Authors:  Ivan Moser; Luzia Grabherr; Matthias Hartmann; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual and vestibular perceptual thresholds each demonstrate better precision at specific frequencies and also exhibit optimal integration.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Koeun Lim; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Reconciling Magnetically Induced Vertigo and Nystagmus.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Paul M Glover; Brian L Day
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Cox's Chair Revisited: Can Spinning Alter Mood States?

Authors:  Lotta Winter; M Axel Wollmer; Jean Laurens; Dominik Straumann; Tillmann H C Kruger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.