Literature DB >> 15488011

Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field.

James D Harwood1, Keith D Sunderland, William O C Symondson.   

Abstract

A molecular approach, using aphid-specific monoclonal antibodies, was used to test the hypothesis that alternative prey can affect predation on aphids by linyphiid spiders. These spiders locate their webs in cereal crops within microsites where prey density is high. Previous work demonstrated that of two subfamilies of Linyphiidae, one, the Linyphiinae, is web-dependent and makes its webs at sites where they were more likely to intercept flying insects plus those (principally aphids) falling from the crop above. The other, the Erigoninae, is less web-dependent, making its webs at ground level at sites with higher densities of ground-living detritivores, especially Collembola. The guts of the spiders were analysed to detect aphid proteins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Female spiders were consuming more aphid than males of both subfamilies and female Linyphiinae were, as predicted, eating more aphid than female Erigoninae. Rates of predation on aphids by Linyphiinae were related to aphid density and were not affected by the availability of alternative prey. However, predation by the Erigoninae on aphids was significantly affected by Collembola density. Itinerant Linyphiinae, caught away from their webs, contained the same concentration of aphid in their guts as web-owners. However, nonweb-owning Erigoninae, living away from Collembola aggregations at web-sites, contained significantly higher concentrations of aphid. For both subfamilies there was evidence of a disproportionate increase in predation on aphids once Collembola populations had declined. It was concluded that nonaphid prey, by helping to maintain spiders in the field, can significantly affect predation on aphids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15488011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  8 in total

1.  Time optimal control of an additional food provided predator-prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation.

Authors:  P D N Srinivasu; B S R V Prasad
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Molecular evidence of facultative intraguild predation by Monochamus titillator larvae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on members of the southern pine beetle guild.

Authors:  Erich N Schoeller; Claudia Husseneder; Jeremy D Allison
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-10-06

3.  Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay.

Authors:  Valerie Fournier; James Hagler; Kent Daane; Jesse de León; Russell Groves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Cereal aphid colony turnover and persistence in winter wheat.

Authors:  Linton Winder; Colin J Alexander; Chris Woolley; Joe N Perry; John M Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does prey encounter and nutrient content affect prey selection in wolf spiders inhabiting Bt cotton fields?

Authors:  Dalila Rendon; Phillip W Taylor; Shawn M Wilder; Mary E A Whitehouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation.

Authors:  Daniela Sint; Lorna Raso; Rüdiger Kaufmann; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Elucidating the Common Generalist Predators of Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in an Organic Apple Orchard Using Molecular Gut-Content Analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Zsofia Szendrei; Matthew Grieshop
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Consuming alternative prey does not influence the DNA detectability half-life of pest prey in spider gut contents.

Authors:  Dávid Fülöp; Éva Szita; Regina Gerstenbrand; Gergely Tholt; Ferenc Samu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.