Literature DB >> 15487698

Interpreting mercury in blood and urine of individual patients.

Kern L Nuttall1.   

Abstract

The effects of mercury exposure are determined by: (a) chemical form, (b) route of exposure, (c) dose, and (d) patient factors. Patient factors include age, genetics, environmental aspects, and nutritional status, and are responsible for different individual responses to similar doses. When blood and urine are collected to evaluate exposure, the results are influenced by (a) specimen collection, (b) analysis, and (c) the time elapsed from exposure. Interpretation is influenced by the patient's symptoms and is facilitated by comparison to published reports. The ranges reported in the literature are broad, with elevations as high as 16,000 microg/L in blood and 11,000 microg/L in urine. Interpretation is relatively straightforward when the results are massively elevated, but becomes increasingly difficult as concentrations approach the population norms (blood and urine mercury < 10-20 microg/L). Interpretation can be aided by biological markers (eg, urine porphyrins, beta2-microglobulin, and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15487698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 0091-7370            Impact factor:   1.256


  17 in total

1.  Lethal concentrations of mercury or lead do not affect coagulation kinetics in human plasma.

Authors:  Vance G Nielsen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Is mercury in Tibetan Medicine toxic? Clinical, neurocognitive and biochemical results of an initial cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarah Sallon; Yahav Dory; Yazeed Barghouthy; Tsewang Tamdin; Rigzin Sangmo; Jamyang Tashi; Sonam Yangdon; Tenzin Yeshi; Tsetan Sadutshang; Michal Rotenberg; Elinor Cohen; Yehudit Harlavan; Galit Sharabi; Tali Bdolah-Abram
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  Hidden sources of mercury in clinical laboratories.

Authors:  C R Alvarez-Chavez; R A Federico-Perez; A Gomez-Alvarez; L E Velazquez-Contreras; R Perez-Rios
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Managing mercury exposure in northern Canadian communities.

Authors:  Catherine McLean Pirkle; Gina Muckle; Melanie Lemire
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Microfluidic assessment of red blood cell mediated microvascular occlusion.

Authors:  Yuncheng Man; Erdem Kucukal; Ran An; Quentin D Watson; Jürgen Bosch; Peter A Zimmerman; Jane A Little; Umut A Gurkan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Bloodlettings in Hemochromatosis Result in Increased Blood Lead (Pb) Concentrations.

Authors:  Mazyar Yazdani; Sonia Distante; Lars Mørkrid; Rune J Ulvik; Bjørn J Bolann
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.081

Review 7.  A review of mercury exposure among artisanal small-scale gold miners in developing countries.

Authors:  Anders Kasper Bruun Kristensen; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Relationship between blood mercury concentration and waist-to-hip ratio in elderly Korean individuals living in coastal areas.

Authors:  Chang-Hun You; Byoung-Gwon Kim; Jung-Man Kim; Seung-Do Yu; Yu-Mi Kim; Rock-Bum Kim; Young-Seoub Hong
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2011-09

9.  Mercury immune toxicity in harbour seals: links to in vitro toxicity.

Authors:  Krishna Das; Ursula Siebert; Audrey Gillet; Aurélie Dupont; Carole Di-Poï; Sonja Fonfara; Gabriel Mazzucchelli; Edwin De Pauw; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Urinary mercury levels in children with amalgam fillings.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Guzzi; Paolo D Pigatto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.