Literature DB >> 15486520

Controlled comparison of two different doses of milnacipran in major depressive outpatients.

Kousuke Kanemoto1, Momoyo Matsubara, Koichi Yamashita, Yoko Tarao, Eriko Inada, Tatsuo Sekine.   

Abstract

We compared the antidepressant efficacy and patient tolerance of two different doses of milnacipran (75 mg and 150 mg daily) in 66 outpatients with major depression, using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Only new patients who had never experienced frank depressive episodes before, or those who had remained free from thymoregulators for more than 1 year without recurrence of depressive symptoms, were recruited. Subjects were randomly selected to receive a daily dose of milnacipran that reached either 75 mg or 150 mg within 2-3 weeks and then remained stable over an 8-week period. The results showed a significant superiority of milnacipran at 150 mg/day over 75 mg/day at the end of the study period in both response (50% or more decrease in total score from baseline, P=0.026) and remission (total HDRS score lower than 7 points, P=0.034). A response was recorded for 56.0% of the patients treated with 75 mg of milnacipran and for 84.6% of those treated with 150 mg after the 8-week study period. No significant difference was seen between the treatment groups for either individual or total incidence of adverse events. Notably, nausea and vomiting occurred most often immediately after the first visit, when subjects in both groups started with a daily dose of 50 mg. We conclude that additional comparisons between different doses of milnacipran should be performed to confirm or deny the linear dose/efficacy relationship observed in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15486520     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200411000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  6 in total

1.  Remission rates with milnacipran 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day in the long-term treatment of major depression.

Authors:  Kazuo Okumura; Toshiaki A Furukawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression in comparison with other antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakagawa; Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Corrado Barbui; Andrea Cipriani; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakagawa; Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Corrado Barbui; Andrea Cipriani; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

4.  Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression.

Authors:  Kunitoshi Kamijima; Shinji Hashimoto; Eiichi Nagayoshi; Tsukasa Koyama
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Japanese experience with milnacipran, the first serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in Japan.

Authors:  Teruhiko Higuchi; Mike Briley
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Effect of high-dose milnacipran in patients with depression.

Authors:  Masatoshi Hayashi; Masaru Mimura; Tempei Otsubo; Kunitoshi Kamijima
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.