Literature DB >> 15486374

How do patients determine that their metered-dose inhaler is empty?

Bruce K Rubin1, Lolly Durotoye.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how patients determined that pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) canisters were empty and to measure pMDI depletion under different circumstances in the laboratory.
SETTING: Most of the study was performed in a university research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty consecutive patients attending the Brenner Children's Hospital Asthma Center were initially questioned regarding pMDI use, and they demonstrated their use of the inhaler. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Of the 50 children and parents questioned, 74% did not know how many actuations were in their canisters, and all used their pMDI until they could not longer "hear" the medication when actuating. Only half shook the canister before actuating. In the laboratory, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) canisters typically had 86% more actuations than the nominal dose, and hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) canisters had 52% more. Canister flotation was ineffective in identifying when a pMDI was depleted, and water obstructed the valve opening 27% of the time. For CFC inhalers, shaking the pMDI before firing increased the number of actuations per canister (p = 0.009 [vs not shaking]), but this was not true for HFA inhalers.
CONCLUSIONS: If patients are not taught to recognize when a pMDI is empty, they may continue to use the medication for up to twice the intended duration. Until accurate dose counters are added to pMDIs, counting the number of doses administered is the only accurate method with which to tell when the canister should be discarded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15486374     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.4.1134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

1.  Pressurised metered dose inhaler-spacer technique in young children improves with video instruction.

Authors:  Nicole Shaw; Peter Le Souëf; Lidija Turkovic; Lucy McCahon; Anthony Kicic; Peter D Sly; Sunalene Devadason; André Schultz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Relationship between recent short-acting beta-agonist use and subsequent asthma exacerbations.

Authors:  Jason Paris; Edward L Peterson; Karen Wells; Manel Pladevall; Esteban G Burchard; Shweta Choudhry; David E Lanfear; L Keoki Williams
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.347

3.  Historical cohort study examining comparative effectiveness of albuterol inhalers with and without integrated dose counter for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  David B Price; Anna Rigazio; Mary Buatti Small; Thomas J Ferro
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2016-08-26

4.  Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Nashmia Qamar; Andrea A Pappalardo; Vineet M Arora; Valerie G Press
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-03-06

Review 5.  Improving asthma management: the case for mandatory inclusion of dose counters on all rescue bronchodilators.

Authors:  Jill B Conner; Philip O Buck
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.515

6.  Variability in Delivered Dose from Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler Formulations Due to a Delay Between Shake and Fire.

Authors:  Ross H M Hatley; Jacob Parker; John N Pritchard; Dirk von Hollen
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 7.  Inhaler technique: facts and fantasies. A view from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT).

Authors:  Mark L Levy; P N R Dekhuijzen; P J Barnes; M Broeders; C J Corrigan; B L Chawes; L Corbetta; J C Dubus; Th Hausen; F Lavorini; N Roche; J Sanchis; Omar S Usmani; J Viejo; W Vincken; Th Voshaar; G K Crompton; Soren Pedersen
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.871

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.