Literature DB >> 1548522

HER-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma.

D C Allred1, G M Clark, A K Tandon, R Molina, D C Tormey, C K Osborne, K W Gilchrist, E G Mansour, M Abeloff, L Eudey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER-2/neu oncogene have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu in node-negative disease is controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate further the relationship between HER-2/neu and clinical outcome in node-negative disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overexpression of HER-2/neu was evaluated by permanent-section immunohistochemistry in tumors from 613 patients with long-term clinical follow-up enrolled in the Intergroup Study 0011. Patients were stratified into low-risk (n = 307) and high-risk (n = 306) groups on the basis of tumor size and estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Low-risk patients were defined as having small (less than 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were observed without additional treatment after initial surgery. High-risk patients had either ER-negative or large (greater than or equal to 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were randomized to be observed (n = 146) or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 160) after surgery.
RESULTS: The rate of HER-2/neu overexpression was 14.3% in all tumors combined and was higher in invasive carcinomas with (21.5%) than without (11.2%) a significant noninvasive or in situ histologic component (P less than .0001). There was no relationship between overexpression and clinical outcome in the natural history setting of combined low-risk and high-risk patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 453). Based on the reasoning that the influence of HER-2/neu may have been obscured by high-risk features and/or the presence of noninvasive carcinoma, we also analyzed the subset of patients with low-risk lesions not containing a significant in situ component (n = 179). Patients of this group with HER-2/neu-positive tumors showed only 40% disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years, compared with over 80% in patients with HER-2/neu-negative tumors (P less than .0001). A similar inverse correlation was observed between overexpression and overall survival in the same group of patients (P = .0001). In a separate analysis involving patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, those with HER-2/neu-negative tumors showed significantly improved DFS in response to therapy compared with patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors.
CONCLUSION: Overexpression of HER-2/neu is associated with poor clinical outcome in a subset of node-negative patients with small, ER-positive, predominantly invasive tumors and may play a role in resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1548522     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.4.599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  59 in total

1.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-10-31       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A S Leong; A K Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-10

3.  The war on cancer: a report from the front lines.

Authors:  Gavin Melmed
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 6.  Anthracycline Use for Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: a Review.

Authors:  Sakshi Jasra; Jesus Anampa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-11

7.  Clinical significance of the quantitative assessment of the cytosolic concentration of HER-2/neu protein in breast cancer by immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA).

Authors:  Maria D Corte; Juan A Rodil; Julio Vázquez; Lucia García; Juan C Rodríguez; Miguel Bongera; José C Fernández; Luis O González; Ma Luz Lamelas; Maite Allende; José L García-Muñiz; Antonio Fueyo; Francisco J Vizoso
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

9.  The epidermal growth factor receptor family in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelos K Koutras; T R Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The effect of HER2 expression on cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Zuleyha Calikusu; Yesim Yildirim; Zafer Akcali; Hakan Sakalli; Nebil Bal; Ilker Unal; Ozgur Ozyilkan
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.