Literature DB >> 15484717

Effects of body weight at, and lighting regimen and growth curve to, 20 weeks on laying performance in broiler breeders.

R M Gous1, P Cherry.   

Abstract

1. A total of 4000 Ross broiler breeders were reared to a 20-week target body weight of 1.55, 2.16 (standard), 2.50 or 2.84 kg, using either a convex or concave growth curve. Each treatment group was either exposed to a conventional broiler breeder lighting regimen, with a series of weekly one-hour increments in photoperiod from 8h at 19 weeks to a 16-h maximum, or maintained from 4d on a 17-h photoperiod. 2. Each 100 g increment in body weight at 20 weeks was associated with a significant increase of 0.55 kg in cumulative food intake, and a 1.5-d advance in sexual maturity. However, leaner body weights at 20 weeks resulted in smaller body weight gains between 20 and 60 weeks (-2.4 g/d/kg body weight at 20 weeks), and an increased production of double-yolked eggs. Neither egg production nor mean egg weight was affected by 20-week body weight. 3. Birds fed to produce more rapid early growth had higher feed intakes to 20 weeks, but reached sexual maturity 7 d later than birds permitted accelerated growth from 15 weeks. Growth curve did not influence body weight gain in lay, egg production or mean egg weight. 4. Birds maintained on 17-h photoperiods reached sexual maturity 27 d later, produced 7 fewer eggs to 60 weeks, and had a mean egg weight 1.2 g heavier than birds photostimulated at 19 weeks. Lighting treatment did not affect food intake to 20 weeks, the proportion of double-yolked eggs or body weight gain between 20 and 60 weeks. 5. Birds fed to have a faster growth early in the rearing phase and maintained on 17-h photoperiods produced 11 fewer eggs than those fed to have accelerated growth at the end of the rearing phase, yet there was only one egg difference between the growth-curve groups for the conventionally lighted birds, which was not significant. 6. The earlier sexual maturity of the conventionally lighted birds compared with those maintained on 17-h photoperiods either indicates that broiler breeders require an increment in photoperiod to stimulate rapid gonadal development or that broiler breeders exhibit juvenile photorefractoriness that takes longer to be dissipated when birds are not given a period of short days. 7. The findings suggest that a nutritional stimulus late in rearing is only necessary for satisfactory egg production if birds have not received a concurrent increment in photoperiod.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15484717     DOI: 10.1080/00071660400001256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  3 in total

1.  Effect of quantitative feed restriction on broiler performance.

Authors:  T L Khetani; T T Nkukwana; M Chimonyo; V Muchenje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Impact of growth curve and dietary energy-to-protein ratio on productive performance of broiler breeders.

Authors:  J Heijmans; M Duijster; W J J Gerrits; B Kemp; R P Kwakkel; H van den Brand
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight.

Authors:  S A S van der Klein; G Y Bédécarrats; M J Zuidhof
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.