Literature DB >> 15484662

Update on pharmaceutical trials in acute spinal cord injury.

Daniel P Lammertse1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the major pharmacological trials in acute spinal cord injury (SCI) that have been conducted over the past 25 years.
METHODS: Review article.
RESULTS: The publication of the first National Acute Spinal Cord Injury (NASCIS) trial in 1984 ushered in the era of pharmacological trials of therapies intended to improve neurologic outcome in acute SCI. Subsequent trials of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) and GM-1 have added to the evidence basis that informs the current management practices for acute SCI.
CONCLUSION: The last 50 years have seen a conceptual shift from the pessimism of the past to a cautious optimism that the meager prognosis for neurologic recovery in acute SCI will yield to the progress of medical science. Major advances in the understanding of primary and secondary injury mechanisms have led to the preclinical study of many promising pharmacological therapies, all with the goal of improving neurologic outcome. A few of these drugs have stood the test of animal model experiments and have made it to the forum of human clinical trials. The NASCIS trials of methylprednisolone have been acknowledged widely as the first human studies to claim improved neurologic outcome. Although the results of these trials remain controversial, the MPSS therapy that they reported has been adopted widely by clinicians around the world as the best currently available, even if not a consensus "standard of care." Clearly, the challenge for medical science remains. The search for effective treatment has only begun.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15484662     DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11753769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  6 in total

1.  The effect of minocycline on motor neuron recovery and neuropathic pain in a rat model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dong Charn Cho; Jin Hwan Cheong; Moon Sul Yang; Se Jin Hwang; Jae Min Kim; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-02-28

Review 2.  A quantitative analysis of clinical trial designs in spinal cord injury based on ICCP guidelines.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Coenzyme Q10 Influences on the Levels of TNF-α and IL-10 and the Ratio of Bax/Bcl2 in a Menopausal Rat Model Following Lumbar Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sajad Hassanzadeh; Seyed Behnamedin Jameie; Maryam Soleimani; Mona Farhadi; Mahdieh Kerdari; Navid Danaei
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 4.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Reier; Michael A Lane; Edward D Hall; Y D Teng; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

5.  Decreased GFAP expression and improved functional recovery in contused spinal cord of rats following valproic acid therapy.

Authors:  Marzieh Darvishi; Taki Tiraihi; Seyed A Mesbah-Namin; AliReza Delshad; Taher Taheri
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 6.  Inflammation & apoptosis in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Ying Yin; Sheng-Jie Xu; Yong-Ping Wu; Wei-Shan Chen
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.