Literature DB >> 15483463

Patterns of resistance emerging in HIV-1 from antiretroviral-experienced patients undergoing intensification therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Damian J McColl1, Nicolas A Margot, Michael Wulfsohn, Dion F Coakley, Andrew K Cheng, Michael D Miller.   

Abstract

Study GS-99-907 was a 48-week, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled intensification trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF). Antiretroviral-experienced patients added tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily to their existing regimen. The patterns of HIV-1 resistance development and the corresponding virologic responses were evaluated in a virology substudy at week 48. Although 94% of these treatment-experienced patients had nucleoside-associated resistance mutations (NAMs) at baseline, addition of tenofovir DF resulted in a mean reduction in viral load of -0.59 log10 copies/mL after 24 weeks that was durable through 48 weeks. Relative to the placebo-controlled arm, patients in the tenofovir DF arm had a reduced frequency of development of resistance mutations to all classes of HIV-1 inhibitors, with reduction in new protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations achieving statistical significance. The K65R mutation, which occurred in 8 patients (3%), was the only emergent mutation directly associated with tenofovir DF therapy. New thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs) emerged in 19% of patients by week 48. Other than K65R, the patterns of mutations that developed were not significantly different between the tenofovir DF and placebo control arms, suggesting that the background therapies caused their development. The K65R mutation emerged only in patients with no detectable TAMs at baseline, whereas new TAMs developed similarly between patients with or without TAMs at baseline. Development of K65R was associated with mostly low-level changes in phenotypic susceptibility to tenofovir DF and other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and was not associated with viral load rebound. No novel patterns of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to tenofovir were identified. Therefore, intensification with once-daily tenofovir DF therapy resulted in a sustained reduction in HIV-1 viral load and a low risk for development of the K65R mutation in this treatment-experienced patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15483463     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200411010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  16 in total

1.  High rate of K65R for antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with subtype C HIV infection failing a tenofovir-containing first-line regimen.

Authors:  Henry Sunpath; Baohua Wu; Michelle Gordon; Jane Hampton; Brent Johnson; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Claudia Ordonez; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Vincent C Marconi
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the incorporation of anti-HIV nucleotide analogs catalyzed by human X- and Y-family DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Jessica A Brown; Lindsey R Pack; Jason D Fowler; Zucai Suo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Antiretroviral therapy : optimal sequencing of therapy to avoid resistance.

Authors:  Jorge L Martinez-Cajas; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  HIV-1 drug resistance mutations: an updated framework for the second decade of HAART.

Authors:  Robert W Shafer; Jonathan M Schapiro
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  International cohort analysis of the antiviral activities of zidovudine and tenofovir in the presence of the K65R mutation in reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Philip M Grant; Jonathan Taylor; Andrew B Nevins; Vincent Calvez; Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Marc Wirden; Andrew R Zolopa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative selection of the K65R and M184V/I mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients enrolled in a trial of first-line triple-nucleoside analog therapy (Tonus IMEA 021).

Authors:  Christophe Delaunay; Françoise Brun-Vézinet; Roland Landman; Gilles Collin; Gilles Peytavin; Aldo Trylesinski; Philippe Flandre; Michael Miller; Diane Descamps
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Characterization of HIV-1 Resistance to Tenofovir Alafenamide In Vitro.

Authors:  Nicolas A Margot; Audun Johnson; Michael D Miller; Christian Callebaut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Prodrug and conjugate drug delivery strategies for improving HIV/AIDS therapy.

Authors:  M S Palombo; Y Singh; P J Sinko
Journal:  J Drug Deliv Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.981

9.  Treatment options after virological failure of first-line tenofovir-based regimens in South Africa: an analysis by deep sequencing.

Authors:  Maria Casadellà; Marc Noguera-Julian; Henry Sunpath; Michelle Gordon; Cristina Rodriguez; Mariona Parera; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Vincent C Marconi; Roger Paredes
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Reverse transcriptase inhibitors as potential colorectal microbicides.

Authors:  Carolina Herrera; Martin Cranage; Ian McGowan; Peter Anton; Robin J Shattock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.