Literature DB >> 15483163

Study of the lactation curve in dairy cattle on farms in central Mexico.

D Val-Arreola1, E Kebreab, J Dijkstra, J France.   

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of lactation curves has an important relevance to management and research of dairy production systems. A number of equations have been proposed to describe the lactation curve, the most widely applied being the gamma equation. The objective of this work was to compare and evaluate candidate functions for their predictive ability in describing lactation curves from central Mexican dairy cows reared under 2 contrasting management systems. Five equations were considered: Gaines (exponential decay), Wood (gamma equation), Rook (Michaelis-Menten xexponential), and 2 more mechanistic ones (Dijkstra and Pollott). A database consisting of 701 and 1283 records of cows in small-scale and intensive systems, respectively, was used in the analysis. Before analysis, the database was divided into 6 groups representing first, second, and third and higher parity cows in both systems. In all cases except second and above parity cows in small-scale systems, all models improved on the Gaines equation. The Wood equation explained much of the variation, but its parameters do not have direct biological interpretation. Although the Rook equation fitted the data well, some of the parameter estimates were not significant. The Dijkstra equation consistently gave better predictions, and its parameters were usually statistically significant and lend themselves to physiological interpretation. As such, the differences between systems and parity could be explained due to variations in theoretical initial milk production at parturition, specific rates of secretory cell proliferation and death, and rate of decay, all of which are parameters in the model. The Pollott equation, although containing the most biology, was found to be over-parameterized and resulted in nonsignificant parameter estimates. For central Mexican dairy cows, the Dijkstra equation was the best option to use in describing the lactation curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15483163     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73518-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Lactation Curve Pattern and Prediction of Milk Production Performance in Crossbred Cows.

Authors:  Suresh Jingar; R K Mehla; Mahendra Singh; A K Roy
Journal:  J Vet Med       Date:  2014-07-13

2.  A new standard model for milk yield in dairy cows based on udder physiology at the milking-session level.

Authors:  Patrick Gasqui; Jean-Marie Trommenschlager
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Non-linear modelling to describe lactation curve in Gir crossbred cows.

Authors:  Yogesh C Bangar; Med Ram Verma
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Dry period heat stress induces microstructural changes in the lactating mammary gland.

Authors:  Bethany Dado-Senn; Amy L Skibiel; Thiago F Fabris; Geoffrey E Dahl; Jimena Laporta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Body Condition Score and Milk Production on Conception Rate of Cows under a Small-Scale Dairy System.

Authors:  Luis Javier Montiel-Olguín; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Miguel Mellado; Eliab Estrada-Cortés; Sergio Gómez-Rosales; Juana Elizabeth Elton-Puente; Hector Raymundo Vera-Avila
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Analysis of Non-Genetic Factors Affecting Wood's Model of Daily Milk Fat Percentage of Holstein Cattle.

Authors:  Fuzhen Zhou; Yan Liang; Abdelaziz Adam Idriss Arbab; Mingxun Li; Zhangping Yang; Niel A Karrow; Yongjiang Mao
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Herd level economic comparison between the shape of the lactation curve and 305 d milk production.

Authors:  Yongyan Chen; Miel Hostens; Mirjam Nielen; Jim Ehrlich; Wilma Steeneveld
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.