Literature DB >> 1548265

Survivorship analysis in total condylar knee arthroplasty. A statistical review.

R G Nelissen1, R Brand, P M Rozing.   

Abstract

Survivorship analysis, which is often encountered in the medical literature, is used to calculate the probability of a certain event, such as failure of a prosthesis, as a function of the time elapsed since an operation. Possible pitfalls in the use of this method are related to the size of the population of patients and the definition of how the outcome is measured. We studied the outcomes of 204 total knee arthroplasties in 165 patients, using six different end-points, in order to illustrate these problems. Survivorship estimates that are cited without confidence intervals have little clinical value.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1548265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN： 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

1.  How to deal with lost to follow-up in total knee arthroplasty : a new method based on the competing risks approach.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Marta Fiocco; J Christiaan Keurentjes; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cemented total hip replacement cable debris and acetabular construct durability.

Authors:  Aaron J Altenburg; John J Callaghan; Tameem M Yehyawi; Douglas R Pedersen; Steve S Liu; Jessica A Leinen; Kevin A Dahl; Devon D Goetz; Thomas D Brown; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  No improvement in long-term wear and revision rates with the second-generation Biomet cup (RingLoc) in young patients: 141 hips followed for median 12 years.

Authors:  Bart Boesenach; Huub J L van der Heide; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Hip and knee replacement patients prefer pen-and-paper questionnaires: Implications for future patient-reported outcome measure studies.

Authors:  J C Keurentjes; M Fiocco; C So-Osman; R Ostenk; A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert; R G Pöll; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Revision surgery is overestimated in hip replacement.

Authors:  J C Keurentjes; M Fiocco; B W Schreurs; B G Pijls; K A Nouta; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rinne M Peters; Liza N van Steenbergen; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Adelgunde V C M Zeegers; Roy E Stewart; Rudolf W Poolman; Anton H Hosman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007-2016.

Authors:  Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren; Liza N Van Steenbergen; Geke A W Denissen; Bart A Swierstra; Rudolf W Poolman; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.717
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.