Literature DB >> 15482358

Clinical features, effectiveness of drug-based treatment, and prognosis of new daily persistent headache (NDPH): 30 cases in Japan.

Y Takase1, M Nakano, C Tatsumi, T Matsuyama.   

Abstract

Although new daily persistent headache (NDPH) is considered to be one of the most refractory headaches to pharmacological treatment, the effectiveness of drug-based treatment, and the prognosis of NDPH have not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment of NDPH. Seventeen men and 13 women who met the IHS diagnostic criteria for NDPH, were treated for five years from November 1997 to October 2002, and whose headache conditions were entirely available for reference as of October 2003 were investigated in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital. Mean age at onset 35.0 years (range 13-73 years). The onset of headache occurred in relation to a stressful life event in six (20%) patients and any precipitating events could not be identified in 24 (80%) patients. For treatment, muscle relaxants were first administered and if no effect was observed, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antiepleptic drugs were subsequently administered. Results of the drug-based treatments in the 30 cases were 'very effective' for eight (27%) cases, 'moderately effective' for one (3%) case, 'mildly effective' for six (20%) cases, and 'not effective' for 15 (50%) cases. According to the survey on the phone for the patients who did not improve to the level of 'mildly effective' or better and did not come back to our institution as of October 2003, there were no cases found to have spontaneously improved to the level of 'mildly effective' or better. These results suggest that NDPH is highly recalcitrant to the treatments with poor prognosis and better treatments are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15482358     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00771.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  18 in total

Review 1.  Tension-type headache mimics.

Authors:  Sara C Crystal; Matthew S Robbins
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  New Daily Persistent Headache: a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Odyssey.

Authors:  Emily J Riddle; Jonathan H Smith
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  New daily persistent headache: an update.

Authors:  Todd D Rozen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-07

Review 4.  New daily-persistent headache versus tension-type headache.

Authors:  Matthew S Robbins; Sara C Crystal
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-12

Review 5.  Chronic Daily Headache: Mechanisms and Principles of Management.

Authors:  Amy W Voigt; Harry J Gould
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-02

Review 6.  Focus on therapy: hemicrania continua and new daily persistent headache.

Authors:  Paolo Rossi; Cristina Tassorelli; Marta Allena; Enrico Ferrante; Carlo Lisotto; Giuseppe Nappi
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 7.  New daily persistent headache: controversy in the diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  William B Young
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-02

8.  Does NDPH exist? Some clinical considerations.

Authors:  G C Manzoni; P Torelli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  [Diagnosis and therapy of chronic headaches].

Authors:  A May; T P Jürgens
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 10.  New daily persistent headache in children and adults.

Authors:  Kenneth J Mack
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.