Literature DB >> 15482073

The concept of validity.

Denny Borsboom1, Gideon J Mellenbergh, Jaap van Heerden.   

Abstract

This article advances a simple conception of test validity: A test is valid for measuring an attribute if (a) the attribute exists and (b) variations in the attribute causally produce variation in the measurement outcomes. This conception is shown to diverge from current validity theory in several respects. In particular, the emphasis in the proposed conception is on ontology, reference, and causality, whereas current validity theory focuses on epistemology, meaning, and correlation. It is argued that the proposed conception is not only simpler but also theoretically superior to the position taken in the existing literature. Further, it has clear theoretical and practical implications for validation research. Most important, validation research must not be directed at the relation between the measured attribute and other attributes but at the processes that convey the effect of the measured attribute on the test scores. 2004 APA

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15482073     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  105 in total

1.  Validity of measures is no simple matter.

Authors:  Lee Sechrest
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: the range of possible changes model.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Alan E Kazdin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology.

Authors:  Aaro Toomela
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2008-06-05

4.  Psychometric validation of a simplified form of the PICTS for low-reading level populations.

Authors:  David J Disabato; Johanna B Folk; John Wilson; Sharen Barboza; Jordan Daylor; June Tangney
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2015-12-19

5.  Supporting construct validity of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire using Linear Logistic Test Models.

Authors:  Núria Duran Adroher; Alan Tennant
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Tara M Augenstein; Mo Wang; Sarah A Thomas; Deborah A G Drabick; Darcy E Burgers; Jill Rabinowitz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Can We Bring about a Velvet Revolution in Psychological Measurement? a Rejoinder to Commentaries.

Authors:  Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  The attack of the psychometricians.

Authors:  Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science?

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  In Praise of Pluralism. A Comment on Borsboom.

Authors:  Michael Kane
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.