| Literature DB >> 15482073 |
Denny Borsboom1, Gideon J Mellenbergh, Jaap van Heerden.
Abstract
This article advances a simple conception of test validity: A test is valid for measuring an attribute if (a) the attribute exists and (b) variations in the attribute causally produce variation in the measurement outcomes. This conception is shown to diverge from current validity theory in several respects. In particular, the emphasis in the proposed conception is on ontology, reference, and causality, whereas current validity theory focuses on epistemology, meaning, and correlation. It is argued that the proposed conception is not only simpler but also theoretically superior to the position taken in the existing literature. Further, it has clear theoretical and practical implications for validation research. Most important, validation research must not be directed at the relation between the measured attribute and other attributes but at the processes that convey the effect of the measured attribute on the test scores. 2004 APAMesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15482073 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Rev ISSN: 0033-295X Impact factor: 8.934