Literature DB >> 15481509

Women-centred care and caseload models of midwifery.

Maree Johnson1, Helen Stewart, Rachel Langdon, Pauline Kelly, Lian Yong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A partnership caseload model of midwifery-led practice was developed and introduced as an option of maternity care for low risk women at our local health service. To assess the benefits of this new practice model, aspects of continuity, choice, control and satisfaction were examined in women receiving Primary Health Midwifery Care (PHMC) and standard hospital care (SHC). DESIGN AND
SETTING: A descriptive comparative design was used and survey data were collected using a modified version of the Mason Survey of Womens' Experience of Maternity Care from a convenience sample of women receiving PHMC (n = 357) and SHC (n = 202) from a large metropolitan health service.
FINDINGS: Overall, more women receiving PHMC experienced key aspects of women-centered care-choice, control and continuity than women receiving SHC. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: This study, within the limitations of its design and sample size, confirms that low risk women have positively responded to partnership caseload midwifery practice, and the practice model has supported women-centred care with special benefits for primipara women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15481509     DOI: 10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60618-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Collegian        ISSN: 1322-7696            Impact factor:   2.573


  1 in total

1.  COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Mary-Ann Davey; Judith Lumley; Tanya Farrell; Jeremy Oats; Lisa Gold; Ulla Waldenström; Leah Albers; Mary Anne Biro
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.