Literature DB >> 15480800

Hatching asynchrony in Burrowing Owls is influenced by clutch size and hatching success but not by food.

Troy I Wellicome1.   

Abstract

In most animals, siblings from a given reproductive event emerge over a very short period of time. In contrast, many species of birds hatch their young asynchronously over a period of days or weeks, handicapping last-hatched chicks with an age and size disadvantage. Numerous studies have examined the adaptive significance of this atypical hatching pattern, but few have attempted to explain the considerable intrapopulation variation that exists in hatching asynchrony. I explored proximate determinants of hatching asynchrony by monitoring 112 Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) nests in the grasslands of southern Saskatchewan, Canada, over 4 years. Age disparities between first- and last-hatched siblings (i.e., hatching spans) varied considerably, ranging between 1 and 7 days (mode = 4 days). These hatching spans increased with increased hatching success. Hatching spans also increased with larger clutches, but the increase was less than predicted given the increased time required to lay more eggs. Hatching span was unrelated to number of prey cached in the nest during egg laying (an index of food availability), and was unaltered by a year of super-abundant prey. Furthermore, pairs given extra food during laying had hatching spans equal to those of unsupplemented control pairs. These results were inconsistent with both the energy constraint and facultative manipulation hypotheses, which predict that hatching asynchrony should vary with the level of food during laying, when incubation onset is determined. Burrowing Owls were apparently free of food limitation early in breeding, yet may not have been able to optimize hatching spans because food conditions during laying were largely unrelated to food conditions during brooding. Thus, one of the premises for facultative manipulation of hatching asynchrony-that laying females are able to forecast post-hatch food conditions-may not have been met for this population of Burrowing Owls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480800     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1727-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  Hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and other rapidly reproducing hypotheses.

Authors:  M J Stenning
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Hatching asynchrony in Eurasian kestrels in relation to the abundance and predictability of cyclic prey.

Authors:  K L Wiebe; E Korpimäki; J Wiehn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.091

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl.

Authors:  Troy I Wellicome; L Danielle Todd; Ray G Poulin; Geoffrey L Holroyd; Ryan J Fisher
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.