Literature DB >> 15479688

Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn's disease. A prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, x ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy.

F Parente1, S Greco, M Molteni, A Anderloni, G M Sampietro, P G Danelli, R Bianco, S Gallus, G Bianchi Porro.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/ AIM: Although ultrasound (US) has proved to be useful in intestinal diseases, barium enteroclysis (BE) remains the gold standard technique for assessing patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). The ingestion of anechoic non-absorbable solutions has been recently proposed in order to distend intestinal loops and improve small bowel visualisation. The authors' aim was to evaluate the accuracy of oral contrast US in finding CD lesions, assessing their extent within the bowel, and detecting luminal complications, compared with BE and ileocolonoscopy.
METHODS: 102 consecutive patients with proven CD, having undergone complete x ray and endoscopic evaluation, were enrolled in the study. Each US examination, before and after the ingestion of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (500-800 ml), was performed independently by two sonographers unaware of the results of other diagnostic procedures. The accuracy of conventional and contrast enhanced US in detecting CD lesions and luminal complications, as well as the extent of bowel involvement, were determined. Interobserver agreement between sonographers with both US techniques was also estimated.
RESULTS: After oral contrast, satisfactory distension of the intestinal lumen was obtained in all patients, with a mean time to reach the terminal ileum of 31.4 (SD 10.9) minutes. Overall sensitivity of conventional and oral contrast US in detecting CD lesions were 91.4% and 96.1%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between US and x ray extent of ileal disease was r1 = 0.83 (p<0.001) before and r2 = 0.94 (p<0.001) after PEG ingestion; r1 versus r2 p<0.01. Sensitivity in detecting strictures was 74% for conventional US and 89% for contrast US. Overall interobserver agreement for bowel wall thickness and disease location within the small bowel was already good before but significantly improved after PEG ingestion.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral contrast bowel US is comparable with BE in defining anatomic location and extension of CD and superior to conventional US in detecting luminal complications, as well as reducing interobserver variability between sonographers. It may be therefore regarded as the first imaging procedure in the diagnostic work up and follow up of small intestine CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15479688      PMCID: PMC1774299          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.041038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  24 in total

1.  Hydrosonography of the small intestine: comparison with radiologic barium study.

Authors:  G Folvik; T Bjerke-Larssen; S Odegaard; T Hausken; O H Gilja; A Berstad
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Transabdominal bowel sonography in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  A McLean
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  C Gasche; G Moser; K Turetschek; E Schober; P Moeschl; G Oberhuber
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Transabdominal ultrasonography of the small bowel after oral administration of a non-absorbable anechoic solution: comparison with barium enteroclysis.

Authors:  G Cittadini; V Giasotto; G Garlaschi; E de Cicco; A Gallo; G Cittadini
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn's disease and detection of related small bowel strictures: a prospective comparative study versus x ray and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  F Parente; G Maconi; S Bollani; A Anderloni; G Sampietro; M Cristaldi; N Franceschelli; R Bianco; A M Taschieri; G Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  A prospective randomised study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients.

Authors:  A P Toms; A Barltrop; A H Freeman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) in the diagnosis of small intestine lesions.

Authors:  N Pallotta; F Baccini; E Corazziari
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  C N Bernstein; I F Boult; H M Greenberg; W van der Putten; G Duffy; G R Grahame
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Abdominal ultrasound in the assessment of extent and activity of Crohn's disease: clinical significance and implication of bowel wall thickening.

Authors:  G Maconi; F Parente; S Bollani; B Cesana; G Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  3D modeling and virtual endoscopy of the small bowel based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Hans Herfarth; Ron Kikinis; Johannes Seitz; Jürgen Schölmerich; Angela Geissler; Stefan Feuerbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  46 in total

1.  [Diagnostic and interventional abdominal ultrasonography].

Authors:  A Potthoff; M J Gebel; K Rifai
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Wireless capsule endoscopy and proximal small bowel lesions in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Carmelina Petruzziello; Sara Onali; Emma Calabrese; Francesca Zorzi; Marta Ascolani; Giovanna Condino; Elisabetta Lolli; Paola Naccarato; Francesco Pallone; Livia Biancone
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  B A Mackalski; C N Bernstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Forty-slice MDCT enteroclysis: evaluation after oral administration of isotonic solution in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  G Lo Re; M Galia; T V Bartolotta; G Runza; A Taibbi; R Lagalla; M De Maria; M Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Ultrasonography of Crohn disease in children.

Authors:  Marianne Alison; Ahmed Kheniche; Robin Azoulay; Sandrine Roche; Guy Sebag; Nadia Belarbi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25

Review 6.  Bowel ultrasound in Crohn's disease: surgical perspective.

Authors:  Giovanni Maconi; Gianluca M Sampietro; Alessandra Sartani; Gabriele Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease: is it still useful?

Authors:  Imerio Angriman; Marco Scarpa; Cesare Ruffolo; Fabio Pomerri; Teresa Filosa; Lino Polese; Duilio Pagano; Lorenzo Norberto; Davide F D'Amico
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  New pathophysiological insights and modern treatment of IBD.

Authors:  Matthias A Engel; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Ultrasonographic findings in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Gabriella Carnevale Maffè; Laura Brunetti; Pietro Formagnana; Gino Roberto Corazza
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-05-24

Review 10.  Sonography of the small intestine.

Authors:  Kim Nylund; Svein Ødegaard; Trygve Hausken; Geir Folvik; Gülen Arslan Lied; Ivan Viola; Helwig Hauser; Odd-Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.