Scott A Shikora1. 1. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. sshikora@tufts-nemc.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is growing worldwide. Medical therapies are often ineffective, and surgical treatments have significant risk. IGS(R) offers a novel approach to weight loss that was found to be safe and effective in European trials. In the U.S., 2 consecutive trials have been undertaken. METHODS: In 2000, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 103 morbidly obese patients (U.S. O-01) was undertaken. In 2002, a prospective, open label trial involving 30 morbidly obese patients was initiated (DIGEST). Patients were followed for complications, postoperative untoward events, and weight loss. RESULTS: In O-01, there were no significant perioperative complications. However, 20 patients were found to have had lead dislodgements. At 7 months, there was no significant difference in weight loss between the activated and non-activated groups. After 29 months, loss of excess weight (EWL) approached 20%. With DIGEST, there was 1 operative complication (a lost needle retrieved surgically). There were no untoward events or known lead dislodgements. EWL was 23% after only 16 months follow-up. With the introduction of a preoperative screening algorithm, almost 40% EWL was achieved for selected patients in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., the IGS system for the treatment of obesity has been shown to be safe. Technical improvements and better patient selection resulted in improved weight loss. The preliminary results of these trials suggest that IGS may be a suitable surgical option for selected patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is growing worldwide. Medical therapies are often ineffective, and surgical treatments have significant risk. IGS(R) offers a novel approach to weight loss that was found to be safe and effective in European trials. In the U.S., 2 consecutive trials have been undertaken. METHODS: In 2000, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 103 morbidly obesepatients (U.S. O-01) was undertaken. In 2002, a prospective, open label trial involving 30 morbidly obesepatients was initiated (DIGEST). Patients were followed for complications, postoperative untoward events, and weight loss. RESULTS: In O-01, there were no significant perioperative complications. However, 20 patients were found to have had lead dislodgements. At 7 months, there was no significant difference in weight loss between the activated and non-activated groups. After 29 months, loss of excess weight (EWL) approached 20%. With DIGEST, there was 1 operative complication (a lost needle retrieved surgically). There were no untoward events or known lead dislodgements. EWL was 23% after only 16 months follow-up. With the introduction of a preoperative screening algorithm, almost 40% EWL was achieved for selected patients in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., the IGS system for the treatment of obesity has been shown to be safe. Technical improvements and better patient selection resulted in improved weight loss. The preliminary results of these trials suggest that IGS may be a suitable surgical option for selected patients.
Authors: Norman Poole; Ashraf Al Atar; Louise Bidlake; Alberic Fienness; Sara McCluskey; S Nussey; Gal Bano; John Morgan Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2004 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: N Scopinaro; G F Adami; G M Marinari; E Gianetta; E Traverso; D Friedman; G Camerini; G Baschieri; A Simonelli Journal: World J Surg Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: L K Hsu; P N Benotti; J Dwyer; S B Roberts; E Saltzman; S Shikora; B J Rolls; W Rand Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1998 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Hugo Bonatti; Gerald Brandacher; Elisabeth Hoeller; Ingrid Stelzmueller; Walter Mark; Raimund Margreiter; Helmut Weiss Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Francesco Maria Carrano; Miroslav P Peev; John K Saunders; Marcovalerio Melis; Valeria Tognoni; Nicola Di Lorenzo Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: A Bohdjalian; B Ludvik; B Guerci; L Bresler; E Renard; D Nocca; E Karnieli; A Assalia; R Prager; G Prager Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584