Literature DB >> 15479494

Phase II randomized trial of weekly paclitaxel with or without estramustine phosphate in progressive, metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

William R Berry1, James W Hathorn, Shaker R Dakhil, David M Loesch, Don V Jackson, Mary Ann Gregurich, Jennifer K Newcomb-Fernandez, Lina Asmar.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the similarity of response rates and safety produced by weekly paclitaxel with or without oral estramustine in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Between December 1998 and December 1999, 163 patients were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 2, 9, and 16 plus estramustine 280 mg orally 3 times a day on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17, or to receive paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 alone on days 1, 8, and 15. Objective response was defined as a > oe = 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) maintained for 4 weeks with stable or improved performance status. Response rates included 37 partial responses for paclitaxel/estramustine (47%) and 22 partial responses for paclitaxel (27%; P < 0.01). Median duration of response was 15.1 months for paclitaxel/estramustine and 15.5 months for paclitaxel; median survival was 16.1 months and 13.1 months, respectively (P = 0.049). Common toxicities for both treatments included neutropenia, gastrointestinal events, neuropathy, and asthenia. Thromboembolic events were more frequent in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm (no prophylactic anticoagulants). The rate of PSA decline for paclitaxel/estramustine was almost 2 times that of paclitaxel (47% vs. 27%), with acceptable toxicity. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival was not significant for treatment arm (P = 0.08). Although the incidence of thromboembolic events appeared to be increased in the paclitaxel/ estramustine arm, the addition of estramustine was responsible for a 20% increase in the rate of PSA decline. Neither treatment arm had significant impact on quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate quality of life questionnaire. This study produced encouraging data; further studies of paclitaxel/ estramustine are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15479494     DOI: 10.3816/cgc.2004.n.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Prostate Cancer        ISSN: 1540-0352


  6 in total

1.  Current paradigms and evolving concepts in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  The epothilones: new therapeutic agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; Mitchell E Gross
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 3.  Chemotherapy for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Petrylak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Assessing outcomes in prostate cancer clinical trials: a twenty-first century tower of Babel.

Authors:  Gretchen A Gignac; Michael J Morris; Glenn Heller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Effect of adjuvant hormone therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Daju Sun; Xueying Zhou; Youpeng Ding; Yanan Ma; Yi Hou; Xiangbo Kong; Zhixin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Qin; Xiao Li; Jianzhong Zhang; Jingyuan Tang; Peng Han; Zhen Xu; Yajie Yu; Chengdi Yang; Chengming Wang; Ting Xu; Zicheng Xu; Qing Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.