Literature DB >> 15478892

Donor transmitted malignancies.

Joseph F Buell1, Thomas M Beebe, Jennifer Trofe, Thomas G Gross, Rita R Alloway, Michael J Hanaway, E Steven Woodle.   

Abstract

Early experiences in transplantation, which pre-dated brain death laws, utilized organs from donors with active malignancies. The use of organs from such donors occasionally resulted in the transmission of malignancy from the donor to an unknowing recipient. Over a period of three decades, Israel Penn, M. D. catalogued some two hundred and fifty cases of organs transplanted from donors with a history of malignancy; carefully examining each reported case for tumor histology, donor risk factors, method of tumor presentation and recipient outcome. Some recipients never developed malignancies, while others were less fortunate, developing cancers that were suspicious for donor origin. The evolution of transplantation has resulted in improved patient survival, which in turn has led to an increased demand for organ transplantation. Unfortunately, the supply of organs available for transplantation has failed to keep pace with the demand, with the worldwide deficit growing annually. In an effort to bridge the widening gap, utilization of older and more marginal donors has been suggested. However, use of older donors is accompanied by the likelihood that a significant proportion may have undiagnosed malignancies. Multiple transplant programs have considered the use of donors with tumors of non-malignant or even low-grade malignant histology, most often involving the central nervous system (CNS). According to a survey from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), central nervous system malignancies are among the most commonly identified malignancies found in potential donors. This study examines the distribution of potential donor transmitted malignancies reported to the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry. The incidence of tumor transmission is examined in the overall group as well as among individual histologies. We also seek to identify specific factors associated with the risk of malignancy transmission from donor to recipient, in an effort to minimize future transmission of donor tumors to unwitting recipients. The study is based on voluntary registry data, which some argue can be criticized for a lack of true incidence data. In reality, however, this data may provide a more accurate insight since it is based on transmissions from high-risk donors rather than from the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  33 in total

1.  Tumor cells disseminate early, but immunosurveillance limits metastatic outgrowth, in a mouse model of melanoma.

Authors:  Jo Eyles; Anne-Laure Puaux; Xiaojie Wang; Benjamin Toh; Celine Prakash; Michelle Hong; Tze Guan Tan; Lin Zheng; Lai Chun Ong; Yi Jin; Masashi Kato; Armelle Prévost-Blondel; Pierce Chow; Henry Yang; Jean-Pierre Abastado
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Strategies to optimize the use of marginal donors in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniele Pezzati; Davide Ghinolfi; Paolo De Simone; Emanuele Balzano; Franco Filipponi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-18

3.  The dilemma of multiorgan donors with high serum PSA--a pathologist's proposal.

Authors:  Gregor Mikuz; Rodolfo Montironi; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gianni Bussolati
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Mechanisms governing metastatic dormancy and reactivation.

Authors:  Filippo G Giancotti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cancer diagnoses after living kidney donation: linking U.S. Registry data and administrative claims.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Anitha Vijayan; Huiling Xiao; Mark A Schnitzler; Connie L Davis; Amit X Garg; David Axelrod; Kevin C Abbott; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Malignancy after renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppression.

Authors:  Inés Rama; Josep M Grinyó
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Use of extended criteria livers decreases wait time for liver transplantation without adversely impacting posttransplant survival.

Authors:  A Joseph Tector; Richard S Mangus; Paul Chestovich; Rodrigo Vianna; Jonathan A Fridell; Martin L Milgrom; Carrie Sanders; Paul Y Kwo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Donor-transmitted malignancy in a liver transplant recipient: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Brian Kim; Tinsay Woreta; Po-Hung Chen; Berkeley Limketkai; Andrew Singer; Nabil Dagher; Andrew Cameron; Ming-Tseh Lin; Ihab Kamel; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  Sandy Feng; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.126

Review 10.  Neoplastic disease after liver transplantation: Focus on de novo neoplasms.

Authors:  Patrizia Burra; Kryssia I Rodriguez-Castro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.