OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sensitivity of the ELISA used in dairy cattle herds participating in the Victorian Bovine Johne's Disease Test and Control Program (TCP). PROCEDURE: The percentage of ELISA reactors in age and test cohorts was estimated from age-specific test data derived from TCP herds with long testing histories. Age-distribution data from production-tested herds enabled estimation of reactor rates in animals that were culled or died. RESULTS: ELISA sensitivities at the first test round in herds achieving five, six and seven annual herd tests were 16.1, 14.9 and 13.5% respectively. The ELISA sensitivity in 2, 3 and 4-year-old animals at the first test round in herds testing seven times was 1.2, 8.9 and 11.6% respectively but remained between 20 and 30% in older age-groups. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the ELISA is considerably lower than previous estimates, probably because previous estimates were predominantly measured against faecal culture, which has subsequently been shown to have low sensitivity itself, and did not appreciate the long period that appears to precede detectable faecal excretion in most animals.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sensitivity of the ELISA used in dairy cattle herds participating in the Victorian BovineJohne's Disease Test and Control Program (TCP). PROCEDURE: The percentage of ELISA reactors in age and test cohorts was estimated from age-specific test data derived from TCP herds with long testing histories. Age-distribution data from production-tested herds enabled estimation of reactor rates in animals that were culled or died. RESULTS: ELISA sensitivities at the first test round in herds achieving five, six and seven annual herd tests were 16.1, 14.9 and 13.5% respectively. The ELISA sensitivity in 2, 3 and 4-year-old animals at the first test round in herds testing seven times was 1.2, 8.9 and 11.6% respectively but remained between 20 and 30% in older age-groups. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the ELISA is considerably lower than previous estimates, probably because previous estimates were predominantly measured against faecal culture, which has subsequently been shown to have low sensitivity itself, and did not appreciate the long period that appears to precede detectable faecal excretion in most animals.
Authors: David Carslake; Wyn Grant; Laura E Green; Jonathan Cave; Justin Greaves; Matt Keeling; John McEldowney; Habtu Weldegebriel; Graham F Medley Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Pamela Steuer; Bernardita Collado; Carolina Avilez; Carlos Tejeda; Juan P Soto; Miguel Salgado Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 1.559