BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document acute bone loss at the os calcis and compare it with bone loss at the knee following spinal cord injury (SCI) as a potential proxy for bone loss in individuals with SCI. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the knee and os calcis, which also was assessed by ultrasound in 6 individuals--5 with complete SCI and 1 with incomplete SCI--at means of 33.5 and 523 days following injury. RESULTS: Bone mineral was progressively greater as measured from proximal to distal sites. The net average BMD of the knee declined 24% (P = 0.017). The distal femur lost 27% (P = 0.038) and the proximal tibia lost 32% (P = 0.015), whereas the os calcis lost 38% (P = 0.001) as measured by DEXA and 49% (P < 0.001) as estimated from ultrasound. The mean loss of 24% at the knee was significantly different from the loss percentages at the os calcis as measured by both techniques: DEXA (P = 0.036) and ultrasound (P = 0.043). Differences between annualized loss rates at the knee and the os calcis measured by both techniques also were significant: DEXA (P = 0.032) vs ultrasound (P = 0.038). However, annualized loss rates demonstrated the same trend for differential loss at the sites examined in the 5 individuals with complete injuries but not for the 1 participant with an incomplete injury. The loss rates were similar for the complete and incomplete participants at the os calcis, but not at the knee. CONCLUSION: The BMD of the os calcis declined 38% by DEXA and 49% by ultrasound compared with 24% at the knee when measured 1 to 1.5 years after injury. BMD of the os calcis and distal femur measured by DEXA in persons with complete SCI were highly correlated (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001).
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document acute bone loss at the os calcis and compare it with bone loss at the knee following spinal cord injury (SCI) as a potential proxy for bone loss in individuals with SCI. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the knee and os calcis, which also was assessed by ultrasound in 6 individuals--5 with complete SCI and 1 with incomplete SCI--at means of 33.5 and 523 days following injury. RESULTS: Bone mineral was progressively greater as measured from proximal to distal sites. The net average BMD of the knee declined 24% (P = 0.017). The distal femur lost 27% (P = 0.038) and the proximal tibia lost 32% (P = 0.015), whereas the os calcis lost 38% (P = 0.001) as measured by DEXA and 49% (P < 0.001) as estimated from ultrasound. The mean loss of 24% at the knee was significantly different from the loss percentages at the os calcis as measured by both techniques: DEXA (P = 0.036) and ultrasound (P = 0.043). Differences between annualized loss rates at the knee and the os calcis measured by both techniques also were significant: DEXA (P = 0.032) vs ultrasound (P = 0.038). However, annualized loss rates demonstrated the same trend for differential loss at the sites examined in the 5 individuals with complete injuries but not for the 1 participant with an incomplete injury. The loss rates were similar for the complete and incomplete participants at the os calcis, but not at the knee. CONCLUSION: The BMD of the os calcis declined 38% by DEXA and 49% by ultrasound compared with 24% at the knee when measured 1 to 1.5 years after injury. BMD of the os calcis and distal femur measured by DEXA in persons with complete SCI were highly correlated (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001).
Authors: W Qin; W Zhao; X Li; Y Peng; L M Harlow; J Li; Y Qin; J Pan; Y Wu; L Ran; H Z Ke; C P Cardozo; W A Bauman Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: William A Bauman; Christopher M Cirnigliaro; Michael F La Fountaine; LeighAnn Martinez; Steven C Kirshblum; Ann M Spungen Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: C M Cirnigliaro; M J Myslinski; M F La Fountaine; S C Kirshblum; G F Forrest; W A Bauman Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Richard Lauer; Therese E Johnston; Brian T Smith; Mary Jane Mulcahey; Randal R Betz; Alan H Maurer Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Hadis Sabour; Bagher Larijani; Mohammad Reza Vafa; Mohammad Reza Hadian; Ramin Heshmat; Hamidreza Aghaei Meybodi; Hasan Emami Razavi; Abbas Norouzia Javidan; Farzad Shidfar Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.852