OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with utilization of low-volume hospitals for total hip replacement (THR) and to estimate differences in the distances that Medicare beneficiaries had to travel to reach low- or high-volume hospitals. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 1,146 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective THR in 1995. Using multiple data sources including medical record review, Medicare claims data, 1990 Census data, and a patient survey, we examined factors independently associated with utilization of low-volume hospitals for elective THR. We estimated the magnitude of difference in distances for patients undergoing THR in low- and high-volume hospitals. We determined the distance between each patient's residence and the treating hospital using MapQuest. RESULTS: Rural residency, low income, and low educational attainment, as well as belief in the importance of convenient location in the choice of hospital, were associated with higher utilization of low-volume hospitals. Rural and suburban patients who went to low-volume hospitals traveled much less than patients operated upon in high-volume centers. CONCLUSION: Policies aimed at restricting THR to high-volume centers would differentially affect poor, less educated, and rural patients. Voluntary efforts to shift THR to high-volume centers should involve educating these patients and their referring physicians about differences in both short-term and longer-term outcomes between high- and low-volume centers.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with utilization of low-volume hospitals for total hip replacement (THR) and to estimate differences in the distances that Medicare beneficiaries had to travel to reach low- or high-volume hospitals. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 1,146 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective THR in 1995. Using multiple data sources including medical record review, Medicare claims data, 1990 Census data, and a patient survey, we examined factors independently associated with utilization of low-volume hospitals for elective THR. We estimated the magnitude of difference in distances for patients undergoing THR in low- and high-volume hospitals. We determined the distance between each patient's residence and the treating hospital using MapQuest. RESULTS: Rural residency, low income, and low educational attainment, as well as belief in the importance of convenient location in the choice of hospital, were associated with higher utilization of low-volume hospitals. Rural and suburban patients who went to low-volume hospitals traveled much less than patients operated upon in high-volume centers. CONCLUSION: Policies aimed at restricting THR to high-volume centers would differentially affect poor, less educated, and rural patients. Voluntary efforts to shift THR to high-volume centers should involve educating these patients and their referring physicians about differences in both short-term and longer-term outcomes between high- and low-volume centers.
Authors: Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Douglas E Padgett; Ting Jung Pan; Robert G Marx; Stephen Lyman Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Nicholas C Laucis; Mohammed Chowdhury; Abhijit Dasgupta; Timothy Bhattacharyya Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Farrokh R Farrokhi; Kevin J McGuire; Sohail K Mirza Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Ajay Aggarwal; Daniel Lewis; Malcolm Mason; Richard Sullivan; Jan van der Meulen Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.971