Literature DB >> 15477415

Left ventricular pacing minimizes diastolic ventricular interaction, allowing improved preload-dependent systolic performance.

R A Bleasdale1, M S Turner, C E Mumford, P Steendijk, V Paul, J V Tyberg, J A Morris-Thurgood, M P Frenneaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) pacing improves hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. We hypothesized that at least part of this benefit occurs by minimization of external constraint to LV filling from ventricular interaction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We present median values (interquartile ranges) for 13 heart failure patients with LV pacing systems implanted for New York Heart Association class III/IV limitation. We used the conductance catheter method to measure LV pressure and volume simultaneously. External constraint was measured from the end-diastolic pressure-volume relation recorded during inferior vena caval occlusion, during LV pacing, and while pacing was suspended. External constraint to LV filling was reduced by 3.0 (4.6 to 0.6) mm Hg from 4.8 (0.6 to 7.5) mm Hg (P<0.01) in response to LV pacing; effective filling pressure (LV end-diastolic pressure minus external constraint) increased by 4.0 (2.2 to 5.8) mm Hg from 17.7 (13.3 to 22.6; P<0.01). LV end-diastolic volume increased by 10 (3 to 11) mL from 238 (169 to 295) mL (P=0.01), whereas LV end-systolic volume did not change significantly (-1 [-2 to 3] mL from 180 [124 to 236] mL, P=0.97), which resulted in an increase in stroke volume of 11 (5 to 13) mL from 49 (38 to 59) mL (P<0.01). LV stroke work increased by 720 (550 to 1180) mL . mm Hg from 3400 (2110 to 4480) mL . mm Hg (P=0.01), and maximum dP/dt increased by 120 (2 to 161) mm Hg/s from 635 (521 to 767) mm Hg/s (P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a potentially important mechanism by which LV pacing may produce hemodynamic benefit. LV pacing minimizes external constraint to LV filling, resulting in an increase in effective filling pressure; the consequent increase in LV end-diastolic volume increases stroke volume via the Starling mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477415     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145169.82004.CF

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure.

Authors:  S Ellery; L Williams; M Frenneaux
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: when the drugs don't work.

Authors:  R A Bleasdale; M P Frenneaux
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Electromechanics of paced left ventricle simulated by straightforward mathematical model: comparison with experiments.

Authors:  R C P Kerckhoffs; O P Faris; P H M Bovendeerd; F W Prinzen; K Smits; E R McVeigh; T Arts
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Cardiac resynchronization: insight from experimental and computational models.

Authors:  R C P Kerckhoffs; J Lumens; K Vernooy; J H Omens; L J Mulligan; T Delhaas; T Arts; A D McCulloch; F W Prinzen
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  The effects of asymmetric ventricular filling on left-right ventricular interaction in the normal rat heart.

Authors:  Kimberley Pett; David Hauton
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Differential Effects of Ventricular Pacing Sites of Contraction Synchrony and Global Cardiac Performance.

Authors:  Mohammed Alhammouri; Hyung Kook Kim; Yasser Mokhtar; Maxime Cannesson; Masaki Tanabe; John Gorcsan; David Schwartzman; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Shock       Date:  2009-05-01

Review 7.  The Role of the Pericardium in Heart Failure: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug; Yogesh N V Reddy
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 8.  Echocardiographic prediction of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy: conventional methods and recent developments.

Authors:  Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Margot D Bogaard; Mathias Meine; Pieter A Doevendans; Bart W De Boeck
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Paul W X Foley; Shajil Chalil; Karim Ratib; Russell E A Smith; Frits Prinzen; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Paul W X Foley; Francisco Leyva; Michael P Frenneaux
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.