Literature DB >> 15477048

Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials.

S H Halpern1, R Darani, M J Douglas, W Wight, J Yee.   

Abstract

The Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) checklist is an evidence-based approach to help improve the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this study was to determine how closely randomised controlled trials in obstetric anaesthesia adhere to the CONSORT checklist. We retrieved all randomised controlled trials pertaining to the practice of obstetric anaesthesia and summarised in Obstetric Anesthesia Digest between March 2001 and December 2002 and compared the quality of reporting to the CONSORT checklist. The median number of correctly described CONSORT items was 65% (range 36% to 100%). Information pertaining to randomisation, blinding of the assessors, sample size calculation, reliability of measurements and reporting of the analysis were often omitted. It is difficult to determine the value and quality of many obstetric anaesthesia clinical trials because journal editors do not insist that this important information is made available to readers. Both clinicians and clinical researchers would benefit from uniform reporting of randomised trials in a manner that allows rapid data retrieval and easy assessment for relevance and quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477048     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  11 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Guowei Li; Meha Bhatt; Mei Wang; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Zainab Samaan; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.

Authors:  David Blanco; Doug Altman; David Moher; Isabelle Boutron; Jamie J Kirkham; Erik Cobo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Improvement of quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials to prevent hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  A Herdan; R Roth; D Grass; M Klimek; S Will; B Schauf; R Rossaint; M Heesen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-12-18

Review 4.  Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Authors:  Lucy Turner; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Laura Weeks; Jodi Peters; Thilo Kober; Sofia Dias; Kenneth F Schulz; Amy C Plint; David Moher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 5.  Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update.

Authors:  Yanling Jin; Nitika Sanger; Ieta Shams; Candice Luo; Hamnah Shahid; Guowei Li; Meha Bhatt; Laura Zielinski; Bianca Bantoto; Mei Wang; Luciana Pf Abbade; Ikunna Nwosu; Alvin Leenus; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Muhammad Maaz; Yaping Chang; Guangwen Sun; Mitchell Ah Levine; Jonathan D Adachi; Lehana Thabane; Zainab Samaan
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-09-27

6.  Beyond Research Reporting Guidelines: How can the Quality of Published Research be Enhanced?

Authors:  Vikas Menon
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

7.  A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature.

Authors:  Zainab Samaan; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Daisy Kosa; Victoria Borg Debono; Rejane Dillenburg; Shiyuan Zhang; Vincent Fruci; Brittany Dennis; Monica Bawor; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-05-06

8.  A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials.

Authors:  Stephanie L Prady; Stewart J Richmond; Veronica M Morton; Hugh Macpherson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with traditional chinese medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Qin Xu; Qi Sun; Fang-Fang Fan; Xue-Rui Guo; Fei Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Pengli Jia; Li Tang; Jiajie Yu; Jiali Liu; Deying Kang; Xin Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.