Literature DB >> 15476272

Treatment of breast carcinoma in patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes using radiotherapy versus axillary dissection.

Naoko Fujimoto1, Atsushi Amemiya, Makoto Kondo, Atsuya Takeda, Naoyuki Shigematsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of axillary lymph node dissection (AxD) for patients with breast carcinoma who have clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) and undergo breast-conserving therapy has been controversial. If patients do not undergo AxD, then it is uncertain whether specific lymph node irradiation should be given. The authors compared the results obtained from patients w ho underwent AxD with the results from patients who received axillary irradiation (AxR) using one of two radiotherapy techniques.
METHODS: Patients with T1-T2cN0 breast carcinoma were treated from 1983 to 2002 with either AxD (80 patients) or AxR (1134 patients received tangential-field [2-field] irradiation, and 303 patients received 3-field irradiation). The median follow-up was 161 months for the AxD group and 66 months for the AxR group (55 months for patients who received tangential-field irradiation, and 122 months for patients who received 3-field irradiation).
RESULTS: One patient in the AxD group and 35 patients in the AxR group had axillary recurrences. The 10-year cumulative axillary recurrence rates were 1.3% and 4.6% for the AxD group and the AxR group, respectively (P = 0.21). For patients with T1 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates for the two groups were 94.7% and 92.7%, respectively (P = 0.34); and, for patients with T2 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates were 92.5% and 89.1%, respectively (P = 0.34). In the AxR group, the 5-year axillary recurrence rates were 2.5% for patients who received tangential-field irradiation and 1.7% for patients who received 3-field irradiation (P = 0.18), and the 5-year regional recurrence rates for the two groups were 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, positive lymphovascular invasion, outer tumor location, and larger tumor size were significant risk factors for regional failure.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with cN0 breast carcinoma, AxD and AxR yielded the same overall survival rates. Most patients can be treated safely with tangential-field irradiation alone. Patients who are at increased risk of regional failure may benefit from three-field irradiation. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476272     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  3 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Naoyuki Shigematsu; Atsuya Takeda; Naoko Sanuki; Junichi Fukada; Takashi Uno; Hisao Ito; Osamu Kawaguchi; Etsuo Kunieda; Atsushi Kubo
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-06

2.  Axillary Irradiation with High Tangent Fields for Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Can 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy with a Field-in-Field Technique Better Control the Axilla?

Authors:  Naoko Sanuki; Atsuya Takeda; Atsushi Amemiya; Toru Ofuchi; Masato Ono; Haruki Ogata; Ryo Yamagami; Jun Hatayama; Takahisa Eriguchi; Etsuo Kunieda
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Axillary radiotherapy: an alternative treatment option for adjuvant axillary management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Chuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.