Literature DB >> 15476225

A six-month followup of a randomized trial comparing the efficacy of a lateral-wedge insole with subtalar strapping and an in-shoe lateral-wedge insole in patients with varus deformity osteoarthritis of the knee.

Yoshitaka Toda1, Noriko Tsukimura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a lateral-wedge insole with elastic strapping of the subtalar joint on the femorotibial angle in patients with varus deformity of the knee.
METHODS: The efficacy of a wedged insole with subtalar straps and that of a traditional wedged insole shoe insert were compared. Sixty-six female outpatients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized (according to birth date) to be treated with either the strapped or the traditional inserted insole. Standing radiographs with unilateral insole use were used to analyze the femorotibial angles for each patient. In both groups, the baseline and 6-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores for subjective knee pain and the Lequesne index scores for knee OA were compared.
RESULTS: The 61 patients who completed the 6-month study were evaluated. At baseline, there was no significant difference in the femorotibial angle (P = 0.66) and the VAS score (P = 0.75) between the 2 groups. At the 6-month assessment, the 29 subjects wearing the subtalar-strapped insole demonstrated a significantly decreased femorotibial angle (P < 0.0001) and significantly improved VAS scores (P = 0.001) and Lequesne index scores (P = 0.033) compared with their baseline assessments. These significant differences were not observed in the 32 subjects assigned to the traditional shoe-inserted wedged insole.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an insole with a subtalar strap maintained the valgus correction of the femorotibial angle in patients with varus knee OA for 6 months, indicating longer-term clinical improvement with the strapped insert compared with the traditional insert. Copyright 2004 American College of Rheumatology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476225     DOI: 10.1002/art.20569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  7 in total

Review 1.  Considerations in the treatment of early osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Senada Arabelovic; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Tijs Duivenvoorden; Reinoud W Brouwer; Tom M van Raaij; Arianne P Verhagen; Jan A N Verhaar; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 3.  The biomechanics of osteoarthritis: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Joel A Block; Najia Shakoor
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (nonarthroplasty).

Authors:  John Richmond; David Hunter; Jay Irrgang; Morgan H Jones; Bruce Levy; Robert Marx; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; William C Watters; Robert H Haralson; Charles M Turkelson; Janet L Wies; Kevin M Boyer; Sara Anderson; Justin St Andre; Patrick Sluka; Richard McGowan
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Lateral wedge insoles for medial knee osteoarthritis: 12 month randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim L Bennell; Kelly-Ann Bowles; Craig Payne; Flavia Cicuttini; Elizabeth Williamson; Andrew Forbes; Fahad Hanna; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Anthony Harris; Rana S Hinman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-05-18

6.  Effect of ginger powder supplementation on nitric oxide and C-reactive protein in elderly knee osteoarthritis patients: A 12-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Zahra Naderi; Hassan Mozaffari-Khosravi; Ali Dehghan; Azadeh Nadjarzadeh; Hassan Fallah Huseini
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 7.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.