Literature DB >> 1547584

Sedation of children for technical procedures: current standard of practice.

B A Cook1, J W Bass, S Nomizu, M E Alexander.   

Abstract

We sought to define the current standard of care for children undergoing sedation for painless diagnostic procedures by sending questionnaires to 284 pediatric residency program directors in North America. From the 89 responses, we determined that departments of pediatrics set sedation policies for children in most institutions, often with formal written guidelines for these procedures. Most require that children have some form of cardiorespiratory monitoring while under sedation and that they are attended by individuals trained in cardiorespiratory resuscitation until the child is fully recovered. The use of parents to transport and monitor the sedated child is uncommon, and total lack of monitoring is rare. Chloral hydrate in dosages of 25 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg is the most common drug used for sedation; DPT, a combination of parenteral Demerol (meperidine), Phenergan (promethazine), and Thorazine (chlorpromazine), at a maximum dose of 2 mg/1 mg/1 mg/kg is the second; and pentobarbital in a dosage of 5 mg/kg to 7 mg/kg is the third. These sedation regimens were associated with few serious side effects, except that two deaths were reported in infants with congenital heart disease who were sedated with DPT. We believe this survey may reflect the current standard of practice for sedation in North American infants and children undergoing diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1547584     DOI: 10.1177/000992289203100302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  8 in total

1.  Alteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anesthesia in a pediatric population.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Joan E Parkinson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Use of phenothiazines as sedatives in children: what are the risks?

Authors:  K S Dyer; A D Woolf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Sedation for pediatric procedures.

Authors:  T C Sectish; E J Krane
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-04

4.  Options for sedating children.

Authors:  C J Green
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-11

5.  Effect of ketamine versus thiopental sodium anesthetic induction and a small dose of fentanyl on emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children undergoing brief ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Jung; Jong Bun Kim; Kyong Shil Im; Seung Hwa Oh; Jae Myeong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-02-28

6.  Comparison of sedation regimens for pediatric outpatient CT.

Authors:  J K Pereira; P E Burrows; H M Richards; S H Chuang; P S Babyn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1993

7.  Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children: Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus oral promethazine.

Authors:  Ashu Mathai; Marilynn Nazareth; Rinu Susan Raju
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

8.  Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hassan Barzegari; Behzad Zohrevandi; Kambiz Masoumi; Arash Forouzan; Ali Asgari Darian; Shaqayeq Khosravi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.