Literature DB >> 15475813

Electromagnetic interference in cardiac rhythm management devices.

Mark W Sweesy1, James L Holland, Kerry W Smith.   

Abstract

Clinicians caring for cardiac device patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are frequently asked questions by their patients concerning electromagnetic interference (EMI) sources and the devices. EMI may be radiated or conducted and may be present in many different forms including (but not limited to) radiofrequency waves, microwaves, ionizing radiation, acoustic radiation, static and pulsed magnetic fields, and electric currents. Manufacturers have done an exemplary job of interference protection with device features such as titanium casing, signal filtering, interference rejection circuits, feedthrough capacitors, noise reversion function, and programmable parameters. Nevertheless, EMI remains a real concern and a potential danger. Many factors influence EMI including those which the patient can regulate (eg, distance from and duration of exposure) and some the patient cannot control (eg, intensity of the EMI field, signal frequency). Potential device responses are many and range from simple temporary oversensing to permanent device damage Several of the more common EMI-generating devices and their likely effects on cardiac devices are considered in the medical, home, and daily living and work environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475813     DOI: 10.1097/00044067-200407000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AACN Clin Issues        ISSN: 1079-0713


  8 in total

1.  Safety of capsule endoscopy using human body communication in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Joo Won Chung; Hye Jin Hwang; Moon Jae Chung; Jeong Youp Park; Hui-Nam Pak; Si Young Song
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  [Perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter/defibrillators. Recommendations of the Austrian Society for Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, the Austrian Society for Cardiology and the Austrian Society for Surgery].

Authors:  H Gombotz; M Anelli Monti; N Leitgeb; M Nürnberg; B Strohmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Complications of radiofrequency ablation of neoplasms.

Authors:  Albert A Nemcek
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Complications of radiofrequency ablation of hepatic, pulmonary, and renal neoplasms.

Authors:  Matthew J Howenstein; Kent T Sato
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Local Ablative Strategies for Ductal Pancreatic Cancer (Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation): A Review.

Authors:  Salvatore Paiella; Roberto Salvia; Marco Ramera; Roberto Girelli; Isabella Frigerio; Alessandro Giardino; Valentina Allegrini; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Electromagnetic Interference from Swimming Pool Generator Current Causing Inappropriate ICD Discharges.

Authors:  Edward Samuel Roberto; Thein Tun Aung; Atif Hassan; Abdul Wase
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Evaluation of the Cadi ThermoSENSOR wireless skin-contact thermometer against ear and axillary temperatures in children.

Authors:  Kim-Gau Ng; Sook-Thow Wong; Soh-Min Lim; Zenton Goh
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 2.145

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.