Literature DB >> 15475479

Comparison of in vitro models for the prediction of compound absorption across the human intestinal mucosa.

Silvia Miret1, Leo Abrahamse, Els M de Groene.   

Abstract

Several in vitro assays have been developed to evaluate the gastrointestinal absorption of compounds. Our aim was to compare 3 of these methods: 1) the bio-mimetic artificial membrane permeability assay (BAMPA) method, which offers a high-throughput, noncellular approach to the measurement of passive transport; 2) the traditional Caco-2 cell assay, the use of which as a high-throughput tool is limited by the long cell differentiation time (21 days); and 3) The BioCoat high-throughput screening Caco-2 Assay System, which reduces Caco-2 cell differentiation to 3 days. The transport of known compounds (such as cephalexin, propranolol, or chlorothiazide) was studied at pH 7.4 and 6.5 in BAMPA and both Caco-2 cell models. Permeability data obtained was correlated to known values of human absorption. Best correlations (r = 0.9) were obtained at pH 6.5 for BAMPA and at pH 7.4 for the Caco-2 cells grown for 21 days. The Caco-2 BioCoat HTS Caco-2 Assay System does not seem to be adequate for the prediction of absorption. The overall results indicate that BAMPA and the 21-day Caco-2 system can be complementary for an accurate prediction of human intestinal absorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475479     DOI: 10.1177/1087057104267162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coexistence of passive and carrier-mediated processes in drug transport.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Sugano; Manfred Kansy; Per Artursson; Alex Avdeef; Stefanie Bendels; Li Di; Gerhard F Ecker; Bernard Faller; Holger Fischer; Grégori Gerebtzoff; Hans Lennernaes; Frank Senner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Confocal imaging to quantify passive transport across biomimetic lipid membranes.

Authors:  Su Li; Peichi Hu; Noah Malmstadt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Incorporation of lipolysis in monolayer permeability studies of lipid-based oral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Tanmoy Sadhukha; Buddhadev Layek; Swayam Prabha
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 5.  Application of Caco-2 cell line in herb-drug interaction studies: current approaches and challenges.

Authors:  Charles Awortwe; P S Fasinu; B Rosenkranz
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 6.  Progress and future of in vitro models to study translocation of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hedwig M Braakhuis; Samantha K Kloet; Sanja Kezic; Frieke Kuper; Margriet V D Z Park; Susann Bellmann; Meike van der Zande; Séverine Le Gac; Petra Krystek; Ruud J B Peters; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Hans Bouwmeester
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Influence of Physicochemical Characteristics and Stability of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles on Biological Effects and Translocation across an Intestinal Barrier-A Case Study from In Vitro to In Silico.

Authors:  Yvonne Kohl; Michelle Hesler; Roland Drexel; Lukas Kovar; Stephan Dähnhardt-Pfeiffer; Dominik Selzer; Sylvia Wagner; Thorsten Lehr; Hagen von Briesen; Florian Meier
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Brassica incana Ten. (Brassicaceae): Phenolic Constituents, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Properties of the Leaf and Flowering Top Extracts.

Authors:  Natalizia Miceli; Emilia Cavò; Monica Ragusa; Francesco Cacciola; Luigi Mondello; Laura Dugo; Rosaria Acquaviva; Giuseppe Antonio Malfa; Andreana Marino; Manuela D'Arrigo; Maria Fernanda Taviano
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.