Literature DB >> 15475239

Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.

Ke Hao1, Cheng Li, Carsten Rosenow, Wing Hung Wong.   

Abstract

Currently, most analytical methods assume all observed genotypes are correct; however, it is clear that errors may reduce statistical power or bias inference in genetic studies. We propose procedures for estimating error rate in genetic analysis and apply them to study the GeneChip Mapping 10K array, which is a technology that has recently become available and allows researchers to survey over 10,000 SNPs in a single assay. We employed a strategy to estimate the genotype error rate in pedigree data. First, the "dose-response" reference curve between error rate and the observable error number were derived by simulation, conditional on given pedigree structures and genotypes. Second, the error rate was estimated by calibrating the number of observed errors in real data to the reference curve. We evaluated the performance of this method by simulation study and applied it to a data set of 30 pedigrees genotyped using the GeneChip Mapping 10K array. This method performed favorably in all scenarios we surveyed. The dose-response reference curve was monotone and almost linear with a large slope. The method was able to estimate accurately the error rate under various pedigree structures and error models and under heterogeneous error rates. Using this method, we found that the average genotyping error rate of the GeneChip Mapping 10K array was about 0.1%. Our method provides a quick and unbiased solution to address the genotype error rate in pedigree data. It behaves well in a wide range of settings and can be easily applied in other genetic projects. The robust estimation of genotyping error rate allows us to estimate power and sample size and conduct unbiased genetic tests. The GeneChip Mapping 10K array has a low overall error rate, which is consistent with the results obtained from alternative genotyping assays. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  20 in total

1.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Models for High-Density Genotyping Arrays.

Authors:  Chiara Sabatti; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  SNP genotype calling and quality control for multi-batch-based studies.

Authors:  Sujin Seo; Kyungtaek Park; Jang Jae Lee; Kyu Yeong Choi; Kun Ho Lee; Sungho Won
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.839

4.  Distinct error rates for reference and nonreference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Predrag Radivojac; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures.

Authors:  Tahere Akbarpour; Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh; Abdol Ahad Shadparvar
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  On the genome-wide analysis of copy number variants in family-based designs: methods for combining family-based and population-based information for testing dichotomous or quantitative traits, or completely ascertained samples.

Authors:  Amy Murphy; Sungho Won; Angela Rogers; Jen-Hwa Chu; Benjamin A Raby; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  In vitro vs in silico detected SNPs for the development of a genotyping array: what can we learn from a non-model species?

Authors:  Camille Lepoittevin; Jean-Marc Frigerio; Pauline Garnier-Géré; Franck Salin; María-Teresa Cervera; Barbara Vornam; Luc Harvengt; Christophe Plomion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Adjusting for misclassification in a stratified biomarker clinical trial.

Authors:  Chunling Liu; Aiyi Liu; Jiang Hu; Vivian Yuan; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Testing linkage disequilibrium from pooled DNA: a contingency table perspective.

Authors:  Jinfeng Xu; Yaning Yang; Zhiliang Ying; Jurg Ott
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Chen-Yen Lin; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.