Literature DB >> 15474432

Patient and duct selection for nipple duct lavage.

April Johnson Maddux1, Raheela Ashfaq, Elizabeth Naftalis, Ann Marilyn Leitch, Susan Hoover, David Euhus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple ductal lavage (NDL) is a new minimally invasive procedure with the potential to help identify women who could benefit from breast cancer risk intervention. NDL is currently encouraged for women with fluid-producing ducts and a 5-year Gail risk > or =1.7%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the atypia rate by NDL in fluid-producing ducts compared with non-fluid-producing ducts and the atypia rate in high-risk verses low-risk patients to determine if current recommendations are supported.
METHODS: Fifty-nine women were studied with NDL. The 226 ducts lavaged included all fluid-producing ducts (n = 136) and any dry ducts we could cannulate (n = 90). Breast cancer risk was calculated using mathematic models.
RESULTS: There were 26 (44%) women with a 5-year Gail risk > or =1.7% and 33 (56%) with a 5-year Gail risk <1.7%. Cytologic atypia was diagnosed in 20 of 59 (34%) of patients. The atypia rate was similar for women with a 5-year Gail risk > or =1.7% (9 of 26 or 35%) compared with lower-risk women (11 of 33 or 33%, P = 1.0) and for fluid-producing ducts (26 of 136 or 19%) compared with dry ducts (14 of 90 or 15%, P = 0.61). No significant differences were found when the atypia was categorized as mild versus marked. Of note, the insufficient sample rate was higher for dry ducts (33%) compared with fluid-producing duct (22%, P = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: If NDL results are found to correlate with breast cancer incidence, it will be important to apply the test in a way that maximizes sensitivity for the detection of atypia in a screened population. We were unable to identify patient or duct characteristics that predict NDL atypia rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474432     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Status of Intraductal Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Meghan Flanagan; Susan Love; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  Does ductal lavage assert its role as a noninvasive diagnostic modality to identify women at low risk of breast cancer development?

Authors:  Ioanna Konstandiadou; Aikaterini Mastoraki; Olympia Kotsilianou; Petros Karakitsos; George Athanasas; Vasilios Smyrniotis; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  The Fourth International Symposium on the Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer, Santa Barbara, California, 10-13 March 2005.

Authors:  Bonnie L King; Susan M Love; Susan Rochman; Julian A Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Patterns of reduced nipple aspirate fluid production and ductal lavage cellularity in women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan A Higgins; Ellen T Matloff; David L Rimm; James Dziura; Bruce G Haffty; Bonnie L King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Gene promoter hypermethylation in ductal lavage fluid from healthy BRCA gene mutation carriers and mutation-negative controls.

Authors:  Imogen Locke; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Mary Jo Fackler; Elizabeth Bancroft; Peter Osin; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Louise Izatt; Gabriella Pichert; Gerald P H Gui; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  The intraductal approach to the breast: raison d'être.

Authors:  Bonnie L King; Susan M Love
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Hoffman; Rod Pellenberg; Catherine Ibarra Drendall; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-06-22

8.  Characteristics of Breast Ducts in Normal-Risk and High-risk Women and Their Relationship to Ductal Cytologic Atypia.

Authors:  David N Danforth; Armando C Filie; Andrew C Warner; George W Wright; Zhonghe Sun; Thomas Ried; Christine T McGowan; Sheila A Prindiville
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.