Literature DB >> 15474204

Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better?

Mary Shaw1, Roy Maxwell, Karen Rees, Davidson Ho, Steven Oliver, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Shah Ebrahim.   

Abstract

Although the mortality and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in England and Wales has declined in recent years, an ageing population has contributed to keeping the prevalence of CHD largely unchanged. Evidence suggests that revascularisation procedures have contributed not only to this decline in mortality, but also to the decline in morbidity from heart disease, and to improvements in quality of life, even in old age. Despite clinical evidence of benefit, revascularisation is less often provided for older people and for women. This paper considers the equity of the provision of revascularisation according to need by gender and age using the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) database which includes all NHS hospital admissions in England. Trends from 1991 to 1999 were examined comparing admissions for acute myocardial infarction (as a proxy indicator of need in the absence of direct measures) and the procedures coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The rates of CABG and PTCA have increased dramatically by 72% and 48%, respectively, between 1991/3 and 1997/9. Making allowance for differences in need, to achieve equitable provision with men, over 12,000 extra CABG and over 5000 PTCA procedures would be required for women, amounting to 19% and 10% increases in the total volume of each procedure, respectively. Similarly, attempting to meet need up to the age of 79 years would require over 13,000 extra CABG and over 13,000 PTCA procedures for men, and an additional 14,300 CABG and almost 10,000 extra PTCA procedures for women, representing 42% and 40% increases in CABG and PTCA, respectively. As women tend to present with CHD at older ages this indicates that they may be the victims of a 'double whammy' of inequity. Moreover, these inequities have remained constant through the study period. Possible explanations for this shortfall of provision are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474204     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Risk assessment after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Cornelia Junghans; Adam D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-11-25

2.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

3.  Complex health problems and mortality among the oldest old in Sweden: decreased risk for men between 1992 and 2002.

Authors:  Bettina Meinow; Marti G Parker; Mats Thorslund
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study.

Authors:  Brian S Buckley; Colin R Simpson; David J McLernon; Andrew W Murphy; Philip C Hannaford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-06

5.  Age and sex interaction in reported help seeking in response to chest pain.

Authors:  Joy Adamson; Jenny Donovan; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Nish Chaturvedi; Ann Bowling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina.

Authors:  Ann Bowling; Lucy Culliford; David Smith; Gene Rowe; Barnaby C Reeves
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging.

Authors:  Anna Oksuzyan; Knud Juel; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Do treatment preferences for patients with angina change? An 18-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Ann Bowling; Barnaby C Reeves; Gene Rowe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Equity in access to total joint replacement of the hip and knee in England: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Andy Judge; Nicky J Welton; Jat Sandhu; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-11

10.  Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.

Authors:  Mike Crilly; Peter Bundred; Xiyuan Hu; Lisa Leckey; Fiona Johnstone
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.